Zyxel Multiple NAS Devices OS Command Injection
CVE-2020-9054 is a critical-severity improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability in NAS326 from Zyxel, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected NAS326 versions: V5.21(AAZF.7)C0 and earlier. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. CISA added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue on March 25, 2022, which means attacks have been observed in the wild.
Attackers are already exploiting this vulnerability, according to CISA.
What to do
- Update Nas326 Firmware to 5.21\(aazf.10\)c0 or a later version.
- Update Nas520 Firmware to 5.21\(aasz.3\)c0 or a later version.
- Update Nas540 Firmware to 5.21\(aatb.7\)c0 or a later version.
- CISA's required action: Apply updates per vendor instructions.
- Read the advisory on zyxel.com for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zyxel | NAS326 | V5.21(AAZF.7)C0 and earlier | Not stated |
| Zyxel | NAS520 | V5.21(AASZ.3)C0 and earlier | Not stated |
| Zyxel | NAS540 | V5.21(AATB.4)C0 and earlier | Not stated |
| Zyxel | NAS542 | V5.21(ABAG.4)C0 and earlier | Not stated |
| Zyxel | NSA210 | all | Not stated |
| Zyxel | NSA220 | all | Not stated |
| Zyxel | NSA221 | all | Not stated |
| Zyxel | NSA310 | V4.75(AALH.2)C0 and earlier | Not stated |
| Zyxel | NSA320 | all | Not stated |
| Zyxel | NSA320S | V4.75(AANV.2)C0 and earlier | Not stated |
| Zyxel | NSA325 | V4.81(AAAJ.1)C0 and earlier | Not stated |
| Zyxel | NSA325v2 | V4.81(AALS.1)C0 and earlier | Not stated |
| Zyxel | Nas326 Firmware | before 5.21\(aazf.10\)c0 | 5.21\(aazf.10\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Nas520 Firmware | before 5.21\(aasz.3\)c0 | 5.21\(aasz.3\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Nas540 Firmware | before 5.21\(aatb.7\)c0 | 5.21\(aatb.7\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Nas542 Firmware | before 5.21\(abag.7\)c0 | 5.21\(abag.7\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Atp100 Firmware | 4.35 up to, but not including, 4.35\(abps.3\)c0 | 4.35\(abps.3\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Atp200 Firmware | 4.35 up to, but not including, 4.35\(abfw.3\)c0 | 4.35\(abfw.3\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Atp500 Firmware | 4.35 up to, but not including, 4.35\(abfu.3\)c0 | 4.35\(abfu.3\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Atp800 Firmware | 4.35 up to, but not including, 4.35\(abiq.3\)c0 | 4.35\(abiq.3\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Usg20-vpn Firmware | 4.35 up to, but not including, 4.35\(abaq.3\)c0 | 4.35\(abaq.3\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Usg20w-vpn Firmware | 4.35 up to, but not including, 4.35\(abar.3\)c0 | 4.35\(abar.3\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Usg40 Firmware | 4.35 up to, but not including, 4.35\(aala.3\)c0 | 4.35\(aala.3\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Usg40w Firmware | 4.35 up to, but not including, 4.35\(aalb.3\)c0 | 4.35\(aalb.3\)c0 |
| Zyxel | Usg60 Firmware | 4.35 up to, but not including, 4.35\(aaky.3\)c0 | 4.35\(aaky.3\)c0 |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 14 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by NVD.
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 9.8 | Critical | NVD |
| CVSS 3.1 | 9.8 | Critical | CISA (ADP) |
| CVSS 2.0 | 10.0 | High | NVD |
Official description
Multiple ZyXEL network-attached storage (NAS) devices running firmware version 5.21 contain a pre-authentication command injection vulnerability, which may allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable device. ZyXEL NAS devices achieve authentication by using the weblogin.cgi CGI executable. This program fails to properly sanitize the username parameter that is passed to it. If the username parameter contains certain characters, it can allow command injection with the privileges of the web server that runs on the ZyXEL device. Although the web server does not run as the root user, ZyXEL devices include a setuid utility that can be leveraged to run any command with root privileges. As such, it should be assumed that exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to remote code execution with root privileges. By sending a specially-crafted HTTP POST or GET request to a vulnerable ZyXEL device, a remote, unauthenticated attacker may be able to execute arbitrary code on the device. This may happen by directly connecting to a device if it is directly exposed to an attacker. However, there are ways to trigger such crafted requests even if an attacker does not have direct connectivity to a vulnerable devices. For example, simply visiting a website can result in the compromise of any ZyXEL device that is reachable from the client system. Affected products include: NAS326 before firmware V5.21(AAZF.7)C0 NAS520 before firmware V5.21(AASZ.3)C0 NAS540 before firmware V5.21(AATB.4)C0 NAS542 before firmware V5.21(ABAG.4)C0 ZyXEL has made firmware updates available for NAS326, NAS520, NAS540, and NAS542 devices. Affected models that are end-of-support: NSA210, NSA220, NSA220+, NSA221, NSA310, NSA310S, NSA320, NSA320S, NSA325 and NSA325v2
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command before it is sent to a downstream component.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
- For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
More Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerabilities (CWE-78)
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- Added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue.
- Deadline for US federal agencies to remediate, set by CISA.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: active, automatable: no, technical impact: total).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Third-party and government advisories
- cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.htmlThird Party Advisory
- kb.cert.org/artifacts/cve-2020-9054.htmlThird Party Advisory, US Government Resource
- kb.cert.org/vuls/id/498544/Third Party Advisory, US Government Resource
- cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2020-9054US Government Resource
Technical write-ups (may include proof of concept)
- krebsonsecurity.com/2020/02/zyxel-fixes-0day-in-network-storage-devices/Exploit, Third Party Advisory
Recent Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerabilities
- 7.5 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
OpenSMTPD Remote Code Execution Exploited
- 9.8 Critical severity
D-Link DIR-859 Router Command Execution Exploited
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
D-Link DNS-320 Remote Code Execution Exploited
Spotted an error? Tell us.