VC65-C1: Out-of-bounds Write
CVE-2022-21933 is a high-severity out-of-bounds write vulnerability in VC65-C1 from ASUS, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8 out of 10. It can be exploited with local access to the system by an attacker with a low-privileged account, without any action from a user. The record lists version 1302 as the first without the flaw, so updating VC65-C1 to that release or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.28% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is low compared with other CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Update VC65-C1 to 1302 or a later version.
- Update PB60V to 1302 or a later version.
- Update PB60G to 1302 or a later version.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS | VC65-C1 | before 1302 | 1302 |
| ASUS | PB60V | before 1302 | 1302 |
| ASUS | PB60G | before 1302 | 1302 |
| ASUS | PB60S | before 1302 | 1302 |
| ASUS | PA90 | before 1401 | 1401 |
| ASUS | PB50 | before 902 | 902 |
| ASUS | PB60 | before 1502 | 1502 |
| ASUS | PB61V | before 601 | 601 |
| ASUS | TS10 | before 609 | 609 |
| ASUS | PN40 | before 2201 | 2201 |
| ASUS | PN60 | before 808 | 808 |
| ASUS | PN30 | before 320 | 320 |
| ASUS | UN65U | before 618 | 618 |
| ASUS | Vc65-c1 Firmware | before 1302 | 1302 |
| ASUS | Pb60v Firmware | before 1302 | 1302 |
| ASUS | Pb60g Firmware | before 1302 | 1302 |
| ASUS | Pb60s Firmware | before 1302 | 1302 |
| ASUS | Pa90 Firmware | before 1401 | 1401 |
| ASUS | Pb50 Firmware | before 902 | 902 |
| ASUS | Pb60 Firmware | before 1502 | 1502 |
| ASUS | Pb61v Firmware | before 601 | 601 |
| ASUS | Ts10 Firmware | before 609 | 609 |
| ASUS | Pn40 Firmware | before 2201 | 2201 |
| ASUS | Pn60 Firmware | before 808 | 808 |
| ASUS | Pn30 Firmware | before 320 | 320 |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 1 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- LocalThe attacker needs local access or must trick a user into running something.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- LowA basic user account is enough.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by NVD.
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 6.7 | Medium | CNA (cert.org.tw) |
| CVSS 3.1 | 7.8 | High | NVD |
| CVSS 2.0 | 7.2 | High | NVD |
Official description
ASUS VivoMini/Mini PC device has an improper input validation vulnerability. A local attacker with system privilege can use system management interrupt (SMI) to modify memory, resulting in arbitrary code execution for controlling the system or disrupting service.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Out-of-bounds Write
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega, and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND discusses canary-based detection in detail.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Third-party and government advisories
- twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-5547-34bc4-1.htmlThird Party Advisory
Recent Out-of-bounds Write vulnerabilities
- 7.8 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 7.8 High severity
Microsoft Win32k Privilege Escalation Exploited
- 9.8 Critical severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.