CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2022-21933NVD status: Modified

VC65-C1: Out-of-bounds Write

CVE-2022-21933 is a high-severity out-of-bounds write vulnerability in VC65-C1 from ASUS, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8 out of 10. It can be exploited with local access to the system by an attacker with a low-privileged account, without any action from a user. The record lists version 1302 as the first without the flaw, so updating VC65-C1 to that release or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.28% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is low compared with other CVEs.

Next patch cycle

High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.

What to do

  1. Update VC65-C1 to 1302 or a later version.
  2. Update PB60V to 1302 or a later version.
  3. Update PB60G to 1302 or a later version.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
ASUSVC65-C1before 13021302
ASUSPB60Vbefore 13021302
ASUSPB60Gbefore 13021302
ASUSPB60Sbefore 13021302
ASUSPA90before 14011401
ASUSPB50before 902902
ASUSPB60before 15021502
ASUSPB61Vbefore 601601
ASUSTS10before 609609
ASUSPN40before 22012201
ASUSPN60before 808808
ASUSPN30before 320320
ASUSUN65Ubefore 618618
ASUSVc65-c1 Firmwarebefore 13021302
ASUSPb60v Firmwarebefore 13021302
ASUSPb60g Firmwarebefore 13021302
ASUSPb60s Firmwarebefore 13021302
ASUSPa90 Firmwarebefore 14011401
ASUSPb50 Firmwarebefore 902902
ASUSPb60 Firmwarebefore 15021502
ASUSPb61v Firmwarebefore 601601
ASUSTs10 Firmwarebefore 609609
ASUSPn40 Firmwarebefore 22012201
ASUSPn60 Firmwarebefore 808808
ASUSPn30 Firmwarebefore 320320

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 1 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
LocalThe attacker needs local access or must trick a user into running something.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
LowA basic user account is enough.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
Integrity
HighData or code can be modified at will.
Availability
HighThe component can be taken down completely.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by NVD.

Scoring systemScoreSeverityScored by
CVSS 3.16.7MediumCNA (cert.org.tw)
CVSS 3.17.8HighNVD
CVSS 2.07.2HighNVD

Official description

ASUS VivoMini/Mini PC device has an improper input validation vulnerability. A local attacker with system privilege can use system management interrupt (SMI) to modify memory, resulting in arbitrary code execution for controlling the system or disrupting service.

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Out-of-bounds Write

The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How developers prevent this class of flaw

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega, and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND discusses canary-based detection in detail.

More Out-of-bounds Write vulnerabilities (CWE-787)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Third-party and government advisories

Recent Out-of-bounds Write vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.