CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2022-24112Exploited in the wildNVD status: Analyzed

Apache APISIX Authentication Bypass

CVE-2022-24112 is a critical-severity authentication bypass by spoofing vulnerability in Apache APISIX from Apache, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. The record lists versions 2.12.1, 2.10.4, Apache APISIX 1* as the first without the flaw, so updating Apache APISIX to one of those releases or later removes the exposure. CISA added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue on August 25, 2022, which means attacks have been observed in the wild.

Patch now

Attackers are already exploiting this vulnerability, according to CISA.

What to do

  1. Update Apache APISIX to 2.12.1 or 2.10.4 or Apache APISIX 1*, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
  2. Update Apisix to 2.10.4 or 2.12.1, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
  3. CISA's required action: Apply updates per vendor instructions.
  4. Read the advisory on lists.apache.org for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
  5. Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
ApacheApache APISIXApache APISIX 2.12 up to, but not including, 2.12.1; Apache APISIX 2.10 up to, but not including, 2.10.4; 1.3 up to, but not including, Apache APISIX 1*2.12.1, 2.10.4, Apache APISIX 1*
ApacheApisixbefore 2.10.4; 2.11.0 up to, but not including, 2.12.12.10.4, 2.12.1

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
NoneNo account or login is needed.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
Integrity
HighData or code can be modified at will.
Availability
HighThe component can be taken down completely.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by NVD.

Scoring systemScoreSeverityScored by
CVSS 3.19.8CriticalNVD
CVSS 3.19.8CriticalCISA (ADP)
CVSS 2.07.5HighNVD

Official description

An attacker can abuse the batch-requests plugin to send requests to bypass the IP restriction of Admin API. A default configuration of Apache APISIX (with default API key) is vulnerable to remote code execution. When the admin key was changed or the port of Admin API was changed to a port different from the data panel, the impact is lower. But there is still a risk to bypass the IP restriction of Apache APISIX's data panel. There is a check in the batch-requests plugin which overrides the client IP with its real remote IP. But due to a bug in the code, this check can be bypassed.

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Authentication Bypass by Spoofing

This attack-focused weakness is caused by incorrectly implemented authentication schemes that are subject to spoofing attacks.

More Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerabilities (CWE-290)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. Added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue.
  3. Deadline for US federal agencies to remediate, set by CISA.
  4. CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: active, automatable: yes, technical impact: total).
  5. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Patches and release notes

Third-party and government advisories

Technical write-ups (may include proof of concept)

Other vulnerabilities in Apache APISIX

All Apache APISIX vulnerabilities

Recent Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.