CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2022-40628NVD status: Modified

Firewall: Improper Control of Generation of Code

Published Updated By the CyberSecBulletin desk

CVE-2022-40628 is a critical-severity improper control of generation of code vulnerability in Firewall from Tacitine, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. The record lists versions EN6200-PRIME QUAD-35*, EN6200-PRIME QUAD-100* as the first without the flaw, so updating Firewall to one of those releases or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 2.24% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 83% of scored CVEs.

Patch this week

Critical severity: a successful attack would have severe impact.

What to do

  1. Update Firewall to EN6200-PRIME QUAD-35* or EN6200-PRIME QUAD-100*, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
  2. Update En6200-prime Quad-35 Firmware to 22.21.2 or a later version.
  3. Update En6200-prime Quad-100 Firmware to 22.21.2 or a later version.
  4. Read the advisory on tacitine.com for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
  5. Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
TacitineFirewall19.1.1 up to, but not including, EN6200-PRIME QUAD-35*; 19.1.1 up to, but not including, EN6200-PRIME QUAD-100*EN6200-PRIME QUAD-35*, EN6200-PRIME QUAD-100*
TacitineEn6200-prime Quad-35 Firmware19.1.1 up to, but not including, 22.21.222.21.2
TacitineEn6200-prime Quad-100 Firmware19.1.1 up to, but not including, 22.21.222.21.2

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
NoneNo account or login is needed.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
Integrity
HighData or code can be modified at will.
Availability
HighThe component can be taken down completely.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by NVD.

Scoring systemScoreSeverityScored by
CVSS 3.19.8CriticalCNA (cert-in.org.in)
CVSS 3.19.8CriticalNVD

Official description

This vulnerability exists in Tacitine Firewall, all versions of EN6200-PRIME QUAD-35 and EN6200-PRIME QUAD-100 between 19.1.1 to 22.20.1 (inclusive), due to improper control of code generation in the Tacitine Firewall web-based management interface. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted http request on the targeted device. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the targeted device.

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Improper Control of Generation of Code

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.

How developers prevent this class of flaw

  • Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
  • Run your code in a jail or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise. Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
  • Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.

More Improper Control of Generation of Code vulnerabilities (CWE-94)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: yes, technical impact: total).
  3. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Third-party and government advisories

Other vulnerabilities in Firewall

All Firewall vulnerabilities

Recent Improper Control of Generation of Code vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.