CLUSTERPRO X (EXPRESSCLUSTER X): Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay
CVE-2023-39547 is a high-severity authentication bypass by capture-replay vulnerability in CLUSTERPRO X (EXPRESSCLUSTER X) from NEC, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an attacker with a low-privileged account, without any action from a user. Affected CLUSTERPRO X (EXPRESSCLUSTER X) versions: 1.0, 2.0 2.1, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0 and 5.1. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.63% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 51% of scored CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Check which version of CLUSTERPRO X (EXPRESSCLUSTER X) you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEC | CLUSTERPRO X (EXPRESSCLUSTER X) | 1.0, 2.0 2.1, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0 and 5.1 | Not stated |
| NEC | CLUSTERPRO X SingleServerSafe (EXPRESSCLUSTER X SingleServerSafe) | 1.0, 2.0 2.1, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 5.0 and 5.1 | Not stated |
| Nec | Expresscluster X | 1.0; 2.0; 2.1; 3.0; 3.1; 3.2; 3.3; 4.0; and 4 more ranges | Not stated |
| Nec | Expresscluster X Singleserversafe | 1.0; 2.0; 2.1; 3.0; 3.1; 3.2; 3.3; 4.0; and 4 more ranges | Not stated |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- LowA basic user account is enough.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by NVD.
Official description
CLUSTERPRO X Ver5.1 and earlier and EXPRESSCLUSTER X 5.1 and earlier, CLUSTERPRO X SingleServerSafe 5.1 and earlier, EXPRESSCLUSTER X SingleServerSafe 5.1 and earlier allows a attacker to log in to the product may execute an arbitrary command.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay
A capture-replay flaw exists when the design of the product makes it possible for a malicious user to sniff network traffic and bypass authentication by replaying it to the server in question to the same effect as the original message (or with minor changes).
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Utilize some sequence or time stamping functionality along with a checksum which takes this into account in order to ensure that messages can be parsed only once.
- Since any attacker who can listen to traffic can see sequence numbers, it is necessary to sign messages with some kind of cryptography to ensure that sequence numbers are not simply doctored along with content.
More Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay vulnerabilities (CWE-294)
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: total).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Patches and release notes
- jpn.nec.com/security-info/secinfo/nv23-009_en.htmlThird Party Advisory
Other vulnerabilities in CLUSTERPRO X (EXPRESSCLUSTER X)
- 8.8 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
Recent Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay vulnerabilities
- 8.1 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 9.1 Critical severity
- 9.1 Critical severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.