crypto/tls: Observable Discrepancy
CVE-2023-45287 is a high-severity observable discrepancy vulnerability in crypto/tls from Go standard library, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. The record lists version 1.20.0 as the first without the flaw, so updating crypto/tls to that release or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 1.25% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 70% of scored CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Update crypto/tls to 1.20.0 or a later version.
- Update Go to 1.20.0 or a later version.
- Read the advisory on pkg.go.dev for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go standard library | crypto/tls | before 1.20.0 | 1.20.0 |
| Go | Go | before 1.20.0 | 1.20.0 |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- NoneNothing can be modified.
- Availability
- NoneAvailability is not affected.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N. Scored by NVD.
Official description
Before Go 1.20, the RSA based TLS key exchanges used the math/big library, which is not constant time. RSA blinding was applied to prevent timing attacks, but analysis shows this may not have been fully effective. In particular it appears as if the removal of PKCS#1 padding may leak timing information, which in turn could be used to recover session key bits. In Go 1.20, the crypto/tls library switched to a fully constant time RSA implementation, which we do not believe exhibits any timing side channels.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Observable Discrepancy
The product behaves differently or sends different responses under different circumstances in a way that is observable to an unauthorized actor.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Compartmentalize the system to have safe areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Advisories
Patches and release notes
- groups.google.com/g/golang-announce/c/QMK8IQALDvAMailing List, Release Notes
Third-party and government advisories
- people.redhat.com/~hkario/marvin/Third Party Advisory
Other references
- go.dev/cl/326012/26Issue Tracking
- go.dev/issue/20654Issue Tracking
- security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240112-0005/
Other vulnerabilities in crypto/tls
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 10.0 Critical severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
Recent Observable Discrepancy vulnerabilities
- 7.8 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.