Migration Toolkit for Runtimes 1 on RHEL 8: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory
CVE-2024-1132 is a high-severity improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory vulnerability in Migration Toolkit for Runtimes 1 on RHEL 8 from Red Hat, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.1 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, but only if a user takes part, for example by opening a link or file. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 1.55% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 76% of scored CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Update Keycloak to 22.0.10 or 24.0.3, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
- Read the advisory on access.redhat.com for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
- Because the attack needs a user to take part, warn users about unexpected links and files related to this product until it is patched.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Migration Toolkit for Runtimes 1 on RHEL 8 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | MTA-6.2-RHEL-9 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat AMQ Broker 7 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat build of Keycloak 22 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat build of Keycloak 22.0.10 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 7 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 8 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.6 for RHEL 9 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | RHEL-8 based Middleware Containers | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | RHSSO 7.6.8 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat build of Quarkus | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Data Grid 8 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Decision Manager 7 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Fuse 7 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat JBoss Data Grid 7 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Process Automation 7 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Build Of Keycloak | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Jboss Middleware Text-only Advisories | 1.0 | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Keycloak | 21.1.0 up to, but not including, 22.0.10; 23.0.0 up to, but not including, 24.0.3 | 22.0.10, 24.0.3 |
| Red Hat | Migration Toolkit For Applications | 1.0 | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Migration Toolkit For Runtimes | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Openshift Container Platform | 4.11; 4.12 | Not stated |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 4 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- RequiredA user must take an action such as opening a file or link.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- NoneAvailability is not affected.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N. Scored by CNA (redhat.com).
Official description
A flaw was found in Keycloak, where it does not properly validate URLs included in a redirect. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a malicious request to bypass validation and access other URLs and sensitive information within the domain or conduct further attacks. This flaw affects any client that utilizes a wildcard in the Valid Redirect URIs field, and requires user interaction within the malicious URL.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
- Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth.
More Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory vulnerabilities (CWE-22)
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: poc, automatable: no, technical impact: total).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Advisories
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1860
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1861
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1862
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1864
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1866
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1867
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:1868
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2945
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3752
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3762
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3919
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:3989
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-1132
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262117Issue Tracking
Other vulnerabilities in Migration Toolkit for Runtimes 1 on RHEL 8
- 7.4 High severity
Recent Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory vulnerabilities
- 7.2 High severity
- 9.3 Critical severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.