A command injection vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an…
CVE-2024-2443 is a high-severity improper input validation vulnerability in GitHub Enterprise Server from GitHub, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.2 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an attacker with administrator privileges, without any action from a user. The record lists versions 3.8.17, 3.9.12, 3.10.9 as the first without the flaw, so updating GitHub Enterprise Server to one of those releases or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 2.09% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 82% of scored CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Update GitHub Enterprise Server to 3.8.17 or 3.9.12 or 3.10.9 or 3.11.7, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
- Update enterprise_server to 3.8.17 or 3.9.12 or 3.10.9 or 3.11.7, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| GitHub | GitHub Enterprise Server | 3.8.0 up to, but not including, 3.8.17; 3.9.0 up to, but not including, 3.9.12; 3.10.0 up to, but not including, 3.10.9; 3.11.0 up to, but not including, 3.11.7; 3.12.0 up to, but not including, 3.12.1 | 3.8.17, 3.9.12, 3.10.9, 3.11.7, 3.12.1 |
| GitHub | enterprise_server | 3.8.0 up to, but not including, 3.8.17; 3.9.0 up to, but not including, 3.9.12; 3.10.0 up to, but not including, 3.10.9; 3.11.0 up to, but not including, 3.11.7; 3.12.0 up to, but not including, 3.12.1 | 3.8.17, 3.9.12, 3.10.9, 3.11.7, 3.12.1 |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- HighAdministrator-level access is required first.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by NVD.
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 9.1 | Critical | CNA (github.com) |
| CVSS 3.1 | 7.2 | High | NVD |
Official description
A command injection vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an attacker with an editor role in the Management Console to gain admin SSH access to the appliance when configuring GeoJSON settings. Exploitation of this vulnerability required access to the GitHub Enterprise Server instance and access to the Management Console with the editor role. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.13 and was fixed in versions 3.8.17, 3.9.12, 3.10.9, 3.11.7, and 3.12.1. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build recognizers for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subject to errors or inconsistencies that create weaknesses.
- Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
- Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: total).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Patches and release notes
- docs.github.com/en/[email protected]/admin/release-notes#3.10.9Release Notes
- docs.github.com/en/[email protected]/admin/release-notes#3.11.7Release Notes
- docs.github.com/en/[email protected]/admin/release-notes#3.12.1Release Notes
- docs.github.com/en/[email protected]/admin/release-notes#3.8.17Release Notes
- docs.github.com/en/[email protected]/admin/release-notes#3.9.12Release Notes
Other vulnerabilities in GitHub Enterprise Server
- 7.6 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 7.2 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 7.2 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
Recent Improper Input Validation vulnerabilities
- 7.2 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.4 High severity
- 7.4 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.