ruby-saml: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
CVE-2024-45409 is a critical-severity improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in ruby-saml from SAML-Toolkits, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected ruby-saml versions: < 1.12.3; >= 1.13.0, < 1.17.0. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 12.5% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is in the top 3.72% of all scored CVEs.
Critical severity: a successful attack would have severe impact.
What to do
- Update ruby-saml to 1.12.3 or 1.17.0, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
- Update Gitlab to 16.11.10 or 17.0.8 or 17.1.8 or 17.2.7, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
- Read the advisory on github.com for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAML-Toolkits | ruby-saml | < 1.12.3; >= 1.13.0, < 1.17.0 | Not stated |
| Onelogin | ruby-saml | before 1.12.3; 1.13.0 up to, but not including, 1.17.0 | 1.12.3, 1.17.0 |
| Omniauth | omniauth-saml | 2.1.0 and earlier | Not stated |
| GitLab | Gitlab | before 16.11.10; 17.0.0 up to, but not including, 17.0.8; 17.1.0 up to, but not including, 17.1.8; 17.2.0 up to, but not including, 17.2.7; 17.3.0 up to, but not including, 17.3.3 | 16.11.10, 17.0.8, 17.1.8, 17.2.7, 17.3.3 |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by NVD.
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 10.0 | Critical | CNA (github.com) |
| CVSS 3.1 | 9.8 | Critical | NVD |
Official description
The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Ruby-SAML in <= 12.2 and 1.13.0 <= 1.16.0 does not properly verify the signature of the SAML Response. An unauthenticated attacker with access to any signed saml document (by the IdP) can thus forge a SAML Response/Assertion with arbitrary contents. This would allow the attacker to log in as arbitrary user within the vulnerable system. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.17.0 and 1.12.3.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
The product does not verify, or incorrectly verifies, the cryptographic signature for data.
More Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerabilities (CWE-347)
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: poc, automatable: yes, technical impact: total).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Advisories
Patches and release notes
Other references
Other vulnerabilities in ruby-saml
- 9.1 Critical severity
- 9.1 Critical severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
Recent Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerabilities
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.2 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.