CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2024-6047Exploited in the wildNVD status: Analyzed

GeoVision Devices OS Command Injection

CVE-2024-6047 is a critical-severity improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability in GV_DSP_LPR_V2 from GeoVision, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected GV_DSP_LPR_V2 versions: all; all versions. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. CISA added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue on May 7, 2025, which means attacks have been observed in the wild.

Patch now

Attackers are already exploiting this vulnerability, according to CISA.

What to do

  1. Check which version of GV_DSP_LPR_V2 you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
  2. CISA's required action: Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
  3. Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
GeoVisionGV_DSP_LPR_V2all; all versionsNot stated
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_BX1500allNot stated
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_CB220allNot stated
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_EBL1100allNot stated
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_EFD1100allNot stated
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_FD2410allNot stated
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_FD3400allNot stated
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_FE3401allNot stated
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_FE420allNot stated
GeoVisionGV-VS14_VS14allNot stated
GeoVisionGV_VS03all; all versionsNot stated
GeoVisionGV_VS2410all; all versionsNot stated
GeoVisionGV_VS28XXall; all versionsNot stated
GeoVisionGV_VS216XXall; all versionsNot stated
GeoVisionGV VS04Aall; all versionsNot stated
GeoVisionGV VS04Hall; all versionsNot stated
GeoVisionGVLX 4 V2allNot stated
GeoVisionGVLX 4 V3allNot stated
GeoVisionGV_IPCAMD_GV_BX130allNot stated
GeoVisionGV_GM8186_VS14allNot stated
Geovisiongv-bx1500all versionsNot stated
Geovisiongv-cb220all versionsNot stated
Geovisiongv-ebl1100all versionsNot stated
Geovisiongv-efd1100all versionsNot stated
Geovisiongv-fd2410all versionsNot stated

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 26 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
NoneNo account or login is needed.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
Integrity
HighData or code can be modified at will.
Availability
HighThe component can be taken down completely.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by CNA (cert.org.tw).

Official description

Certain EOL GeoVision devices fail to properly filter user input for the specific functionality. Unauthenticated remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability to inject and execute arbitrary system commands on the device.

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command

The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command before it is sent to a downstream component.

How developers prevent this class of flaw

  • If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
  • For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
  • For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

More Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerabilities (CWE-78)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: active, automatable: yes, technical impact: total).
  3. Added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue.
  4. Deadline for US federal agencies to remediate, set by CISA.
  5. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Technical write-ups (may include proof of concept)

Recent Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.