CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2025-0725NVD status: Modified

curl: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

CVE-2025-0725 is a high-severity buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability in curl, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.3 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected curl versions: 8.11.1 and earlier; 8.11.0 and earlier; 8.10.1 and earlier, and others listed below. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 1.79% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 79% of scored CVEs.

Next patch cycle

High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.

What to do

  1. Update RUGGEDCOM RST2428P to V3.3 or a later version.
  2. Update SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family to V3.3 or a later version.
  3. Update SCALANCE XCH328 to V3.3 or a later version.
  4. Read the advisory on curl.se for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
  5. Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
Curlcurl8.11.1 and earlier; 8.11.0 and earlier; 8.10.1 and earlier; 8.10.0 and earlier; 8.9.1 and earlier; 8.9.0 and earlier; 8.8.0 and earlier; 8.7.1 and earlier; and 32 more rangesNot stated
SiemensRUGGEDCOM RST2428Pbefore V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 familybefore V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XCH328before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XCM324before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XCM328before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XCM332before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XRH334 (24 V DC, 8xFO, CC)before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XRM334 (230 V AC, 12xFO)before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XRM334 (230 V AC, 8xFO)before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XRM334 (230V AC, 2x10G, 24xSFP, 8xSFP+)before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XRM334 (24 V DC, 12xFO)before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XRM334 (24 V DC, 8xFO)before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XRM334 (24V DC, 2x10G, 24xSFP, 8xSFP+)before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XRM334 (2x230 V AC, 12xFO)before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XRM334 (2x230 V AC, 8xFO)before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSCALANCE XRM334 (2x230V AC, 2x10G, 24xSFP, 8xSFP+)before V3.3V3.3
SiemensSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFPV3.1.0 up to, but not including, V3.1.5V3.1.5
SiemensSIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFPV3.1.0 up to, but not including, V3.1.5V3.1.5
SiemensSIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFPV3.1.0 up to, but not including, V3.1.5V3.1.5
NetAppHci Baseboard Management ControllerNot specified in the recordNot stated
NetAppHci H610s FirmwareNot specified in the recordNot stated
NetAppHci H610c FirmwareNot specified in the recordNot stated
NetAppHci H615c FirmwareNot specified in the recordNot stated
NetAppSolidfire & Hci Management NodeNot specified in the recordNot stated

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 2 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
NoneNo account or login is needed.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
LowSome restricted data can be read.
Integrity
LowLimited modification of data is possible.
Availability
LowPerformance or availability is reduced.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L. Scored by CISA (ADP).

Official description

When libcurl is asked to perform automatic gzip decompression of content-encoded HTTP responses with the `CURLOPT_ACCEPT_ENCODING` option, **using zlib 1.2.0.3 or older**, an attacker-controlled integer overflow would make libcurl perform a buffer overflow.

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How developers prevent this class of flaw

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega, and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND discusses canary-based detection in detail.

More Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input vulnerabilities (CWE-120)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: poc, automatable: yes, technical impact: partial).
  3. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Third-party and government advisories

Technical write-ups (may include proof of concept)

Other vulnerabilities in curl

All curl vulnerabilities

Recent Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.