CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2025-14813NVD status: Awaiting Analysis

BC-JAVA: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

CVE-2025-14813 is a high-severity use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm vulnerability in BC-JAVA from Legion of the Bouncy Castle, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. The record lists versions 1.80.2, 1.81.1, 1.84 as the first without the flaw, so updating BC-JAVA to one of those releases or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.33% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is low compared with other CVEs.

Next patch cycle

High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.

What to do

  1. Update BC-JAVA to 1.80.2 or 1.81.1 or 1.84, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
  2. Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
Legion of the Bouncy CastleBC-JAVA1.59 up to, but not including, 1.80.2; 1.81 up to, but not including, 1.81.1; 1.82 up to, but not including, 1.841.80.2, 1.81.1, 1.84
Red HatRed Hat AMQ Broker 7.12.7Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.5Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.1Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.14 for Quarkus 3.27Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1 for Spring Boot 3.5.14Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat build of Quarkus 3.20.6.SP1Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.3.SP1Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 8Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 9Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1.7.GANot specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 8Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 9Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift Developer Tools and Services 4.12Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift Developer Tools and Services 4.13Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift Developer Tools and Services 4.14Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift Developer Tools and Services 4.15Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift Developer Tools and Services 4.16Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift Developer Tools and Services 4.17Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift Developer Tools and Services 4.18Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift Developer Tools and Services 4.19Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift Developer Tools and Services 4.20Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift Developer Tools and Services 4.21Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift Developer Tools and Services 4.22Not specified in the recordNot stated

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 22 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
NoneNo account or login is needed.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
Integrity
NoneNothing can be modified.
Availability
NoneAvailability is not affected.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N. Scored by CNA.

Scoring systemScoreSeverityScored by
CVSS 4.09.3CriticalCNA
CVSS 3.17.5HighCNA

Official description

: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC-JAVA bcprov on all (core modules). This vulnerability is associated with program files G3413CTRBlockCipher. This issue affects BC-JAVA: from 1.59 before 1.80.2, from 1.81 before 1.81.1, from 1.82 before 1.84.

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol.

How developers prevent this class of flaw

  • Ensure that the design allows one cryptographic algorithm to be replaced with another in the next generation or version. Where possible, use wrappers to make the interfaces uniform. This will make it easier to upgrade to stronger algorithms. With hardware, design the product at the Intellectual Property (IP) level so that one cryptographic algorithm can be replaced with another in the next generation of the hardware product.
  • Carefully manage and protect cryptographic keys (see CWE-320). If the keys can be guessed or stolen, then the strength of the cryptography itself is irrelevant.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Industry-standard implementations will save development time and may be more likely to avoid errors that can occur during implementation of cryptographic algorithms. Consider the ESAPI Encryption feature.

More Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerabilities (CWE-327)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: total).
  3. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Other vulnerabilities in BC-JAVA

All BC-JAVA vulnerabilities

Recent Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.