CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2025-59106NVD status: Analyzed

Access Manager 92xx-k7: Least Privilege Violation

CVE-2025-59106 is a high-severity least privilege violation vulnerability in Access Manager 92xx-k7 from Dormakaba, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an attacker with a low-privileged account, without any action from a user. Affected Access Manager 92xx-k7 versions: 92xx-k7: <BAME 06.00. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.8% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 57% of scored CVEs.

Next patch cycle

High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.

What to do

  1. Update Dormakaba Access Manager 9200-k7 Firmware to bame_06.00 or a later version.
  2. Update Dormakaba Access Manager 9230-k7 Firmware to bame_06.00 or a later version.
  3. Update Dormakaba Access Manager 9290-k7 Firmware to bame_06.00 or a later version.
  4. Read the advisory on dormakabagroup.com for workarounds and exact fixed builds.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
DormakabaAccess Manager 92xx-k792xx-k7: <BAME 06.00Not stated
DormakabagroupDormakaba Access Manager 9200-k7 Firmwarebefore bame_06.00bame_06.00
DormakabagroupDormakaba Access Manager 9230-k7 Firmwarebefore bame_06.00bame_06.00
DormakabagroupDormakaba Access Manager 9290-k7 Firmwarebefore bame_06.00bame_06.00
DormakabagroupDormakaba Access Manager 9200-k5 FirmwareNot specified in the recordNot stated
DormakabagroupDormakaba Access Manager 9230-k5 FirmwareNot specified in the recordNot stated
DormakabagroupDormakaba Access Manager 9290-k5 FirmwareNot specified in the recordNot stated

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
LowA basic user account is enough.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
Integrity
HighData or code can be modified at will.
Availability
HighThe component can be taken down completely.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by CISA (ADP).

Official description

The binary serving the web server and executing basically all actions launched from the Web UI is running with root privileges. This is against the least privilege principle. If an attacker is able to execute code on the system via other vulnerabilities it is possible to directly execute commands with highest privileges.

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Least Privilege Violation

The elevated privilege level required to perform operations such as chroot() should be dropped immediately after the operation is performed.

How developers prevent this class of flaw

  • Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system.
  • Compartmentalize the system to have safe areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

More Least Privilege Violation vulnerabilities (CWE-272)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: total).
  3. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Third-party and government advisories

Other vulnerabilities in Access Manager 92xx-k7

All Access Manager 92xx-k7 vulnerabilities

Recent Least Privilege Violation vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.