CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2026-15565NVD status: Awaiting Analysis

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform…: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

CVE-2026-15565 is a high-severity buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.25 from Red Hat, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 1.02% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 64% of scored CVEs.

Next patch cycle

High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.

What to do

  1. Check which version of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.25 you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
  2. Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.25Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4 ELS on RHEL 7Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1.8.GANot specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 10Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 8Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 9Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat Data Grid 8Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat Fuse 7Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion PackNot specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat Single Sign-On 7Not specified in the recordNot stated

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
NoneNo account or login is needed.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
NoneNo data is disclosed.
Integrity
NoneNothing can be modified.
Availability
HighThe component can be taken down completely.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. Scored by CNA (redhat.com).

Official description

A flaw was found in Undertow. A remote attacker can cause Out of Memory on websockets endpoint without authentication on any @ServerEndpoint class that has any @OnMessage method. This allows an attacker to cause Denial of Service attack without authentication and using only a standard WebSocket handshake.

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

How developers prevent this class of flaw

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega, and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND discusses canary-based detection in detail.

More Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input vulnerabilities (CWE-120)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: yes, technical impact: partial).
  3. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Other vulnerabilities in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.25

All Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.25 vulnerabilities

Recent Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.