Telefunken TE24553B45V2DZ Smart TV: Server-Side Request Forgery
CVE-2026-15570 is a high-severity server-side request forgery vulnerability in Telefunken TE24553B45V2DZ Smart TV from Vestel, with a CVSS 4.0 base score of 7.1 out of 10. It can be exploited from the same local network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected Telefunken TE24553B45V2DZ Smart TV versions: V2.78.0.0. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.26% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is low compared with other CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Check which version of Telefunken TE24553B45V2DZ Smart TV you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
- Read the advisory on vestelinternational.com for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vestel | Telefunken TE24553B45V2DZ Smart TV | V2.78.0.0 | Not stated |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- AdjacentThe attacker must be on the same local network segment.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Attack requirements
- NoneThe attack does not depend on a particular deployment or configuration.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- NoneNo loss of confidentiality on the vulnerable system.
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- HighSerious loss of integrity on the vulnerable system.
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- LowLimited loss of availability on the vulnerable system.
- Confidentiality (other systems)
- NoneNo loss of confidentiality on systems beyond the vulnerable one.
- Integrity (other systems)
- NoneNo loss of integrity on systems beyond the vulnerable one.
- Availability (other systems)
- NoneNo loss of availability on systems beyond the vulnerable one.
Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X. Scored by CNA.
Official description
An improper restriction of URL schemes and destinations in the SmartCenter browserseturl command in the Telefunken TE24553B45V2DZ Smart TV running on the Vestel MB181 / Voltron181 / TiVo OS platform allows an attacker with access to the same local network to cause the embedded browser to issue requests to unintended loopback/internal destinations, including 127.0.0.1 addresses. In demonstrated scenarios, requests initiated through the SmartCenter browserseturl mechanism could reach an internal service and receive a successful response, although the same destination was not reachable through normal browser navigation. The issue affects firmware version V2.78.0.0 and is fixed in firmware version V2.85.2.0.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Server-Side Request Forgery
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- If there is a known list of applications, IP, hostname, and/or domains to which the product is allowed to communicate, then use allowlists to ensure that outgoing requests are restricted to these known entities. The allowlists could be in the application code or possibly enforced by firewalls or network segmentation.
- If the product is expected to be able to connect to arbitrary IP addresses or domains, consider using a denylist that includes private network addresses, internal domain names, etc. The denylist could be in the application code or possibly enforced by firewalls or network segmentation.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: partial).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Other references
Recent Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerabilities
- 8.8 High severity
- 8.6 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 8.5 High severity
- 9.6 Critical severity
- 8.5 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.