Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution: Missing Authorization
CVE-2026-3360 is a high-severity missing authorization vulnerability in Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution from Themeum, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution versions: 3.9.7 and earlier. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.64% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 51% of scored CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Check which version of Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Themeum | Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution | 3.9.7 and earlier | Not stated |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- NoneNo data is disclosed.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- NoneAvailability is not affected.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N. Scored by CNA (wordfence.com).
Official description
The Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to an Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.7. This is due to missing authentication and authorization checks in the `pay_incomplete_order()` function. The function accepts an attacker-controlled `order_id` parameter and uses it to look up order data, then writes billing fields to the order owner's profile (`$order_data->user_id`) without verifying the requester's identity or ownership. Because the Tutor nonce (`_tutor_nonce`) is exposed on public frontend pages, this makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the billing profile (name, email, phone, address) of any user who has an incomplete manual order, by sending a crafted POST request with a guessed or enumerated `order_id`.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Missing Authorization
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: yes, technical impact: partial).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Other references
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/tutor/tags/3.9.7/classes/Tutor.php#L563
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/tutor/tags/3.9.7/ecommerce/CheckoutController.php#L1059
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/tutor/tags/3.9.7/ecommerce/CheckoutController.php#L108
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/tutor/trunk/ecommerce/CheckoutController.php#L1059
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3496394/tutor/trunk/ecommerce/CheckoutController.php
- wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/7f365519-dd0a-4f39-880d-7216ce2f7d1e?source=cve
Other vulnerabilities in Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution
- 8.8 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.2 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
Recent Missing Authorization vulnerabilities
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 7.1 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.