Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10: Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency
CVE-2026-33846 is a high-severity improper handling of length parameter inconsistency vulnerability in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 from Red Hat, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 1.26% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 70% of scored CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Check which version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Affected products and versions
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 7 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- NoneNo data is disclosed.
- Integrity
- NoneNothing can be modified.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. Scored by CNA (redhat.com).
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 7.5 | High | CNA (redhat.com) |
| CVSS 3.1 | 7.5 | High | CNA |
Official description
A heap buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the DTLS handshake fragment reassembly logic of GnuTLS. The issue arises in merge_handshake_packet() where incoming handshake fragments are matched and merged based solely on handshake type, without validating that the message_length field remains consistent across all fragments of the same logical message. An attacker can exploit this by sending crafted DTLS fragments with conflicting message_length values, causing the implementation to allocate a buffer based on a smaller initial fragment and subsequently write beyond its bounds using larger, inconsistent fragments. Because the merge operation does not enforce proper bounds checking against the allocated buffer size, this results in an out-of-bounds write on the heap. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication via the DTLS handshake path and can lead to application crashes or potential memory corruption.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency
The product parses a formatted message or structure, but it does not handle or incorrectly handles a length field that is inconsistent with the actual length of the associated data.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- When processing structured incoming data containing a size field followed by raw data, ensure that you identify and resolve any inconsistencies between the size field and the actual size of the data.
- Do not let the user control the size of the buffer.
- Validate that the length of the user-supplied data is consistent with the buffer size.
More Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency vulnerabilities (CWE-130)
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: yes, technical impact: partial).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Other references
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:13274
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20611
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20612
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20613
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26319
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26409
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29197
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30004
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30849
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30850
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:32962
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:33125
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34372
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36004
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:36005
Other vulnerabilities in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- 8.8 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.9 High severity
- 7.3 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
Recent Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency vulnerabilities
- 8.7 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 8.6 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.