CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2026-33871NVD status: Modified

netty: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

CVE-2026-33871 is a high-severity allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in netty, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected netty versions: < 4.1.132.Final; >= 4.2.0.Alpha1, < 4.2.10.Final. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 1.36% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 72% of scored CVEs.

Next patch cycle

High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.

What to do

  1. Check which version of netty you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
  2. Read the advisory on github.com for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
  3. Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
Nettynetty< 4.1.132.Final; >= 4.2.0.Alpha1, < 4.2.10.FinalNot stated
Red HatCryostat 4 on RHEL 9Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat AMQ Broker 7.12.7Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.5Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.0Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat Build of Apache Camel 4.14 for Quarkus 3.27Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat build of Apache Camel 4.18.1 for Spring Boot 3.5.14Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat build of Quarkus 3.20.6Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.3Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat Data Grid 8.6.1Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 8Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 8.1 for RHEL 9Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatStreams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatStreams for Apache Kafka 3.2.0Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift AI 2.25Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatCryostat 4Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatLogging Subsystem for Red Hat OpenShiftNot specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatOpenShift ServerlessNot specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat AMQ ClientsNot specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat build of Apache Camel - HawtIO 4Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat build of Apicurio Registry 2Not specified in the recordNot stated
Red HatRed Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3Not specified in the recordNot stated

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 15 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
NoneNo account or login is needed.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
NoneNo data is disclosed.
Integrity
NoneNothing can be modified.
Availability
HighThe component can be taken down completely.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. Scored by NVD.

Scoring systemScoreSeverityScored by
CVSS 4.08.7HighCNA (github.com)
CVSS 3.17.5HighNVD
CVSS 3.17.5HighCNA

Official description

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. In versions prior to 4.1.132.Final and 4.2.10.Final, a remote user can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) against a Netty HTTP/2 server by sending a flood of `CONTINUATION` frames. The server's lack of a limit on the number of `CONTINUATION` frames, combined with a bypass of existing size-based mitigations using zero-byte frames, allows an user to cause excessive CPU consumption with minimal bandwidth, rendering the server unresponsive. Versions 4.1.132.Final and 4.2.10.Final fix the issue.

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated.

How developers prevent this class of flaw

  • Clearly specify the minimum and maximum expectations for capabilities, and dictate which behaviors are acceptable when resource allocation reaches limits.
  • Limit the amount of resources that are accessible to unprivileged users. Set per-user limits for resources. Allow the system administrator to define these limits. Be careful to avoid CWE-410.
  • For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

More Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerabilities (CWE-770)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: yes, technical impact: partial).
  3. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Other vulnerabilities in netty

All netty vulnerabilities

Recent Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.