Keystone: Incorrect Authorization
CVE-2026-42999 is a high-severity incorrect authorization vulnerability in Keystone from OpenStack, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an attacker with a low-privileged account, without any action from a user. The record lists versions 27.0.2, 28.0.2, 29.0.2 as the first without the flaw, so updating Keystone to one of those releases or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.33% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is low compared with other CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Update Keystone to 27.0.2 or 28.0.2 or 29.0.2, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
- Read the advisory on security.openstack.org for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenStack | Keystone | 14.0.0 up to, but not including, 27.0.2; 28.0.0 up to, but not including, 28.0.2; 29.0.0 up to, but not including, 29.0.2 | 27.0.2, 28.0.2, 29.0.2 |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- LowA basic user account is enough.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by NVD.
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 6.0 | Medium | CNA (mitre.org) |
| CVSS 3.1 | 8.8 | High | NVD |
| CVSS 3.1 | 8.3 | High | CNA |
Official description
An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.2. The Keystone RBAC policy enforcer in enforce_call unconditionally merges the raw JSON request body into the policy enforcement dictionary via policy_dict.update(json_input.copy()), overwriting trusted target data that was previously set from database lookups. Because flask.request.get_json is called with force=True, this works regardless of Content-Type or HTTP method. Any authenticated user can inject arbitrary policy target attributes (e.g., user_id, project_id) into the request body to bypass RBAC checks and perform unauthorized operations on resources belonging to other users or projects. This was introduced in commit 5ea59f52 (Rocky/14.0.0).
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Incorrect Authorization
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: partial).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Patches and release notes
- bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/2148398Exploit, Issue Tracking, Third Party Advisory
Other references
Other vulnerabilities in Keystone
- 7.6 High severity
- 7.1 High severity
- 7.6 High severity
- 7.6 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
Recent Incorrect Authorization vulnerabilities
- 8.1 High severity
- 8.5 High severity
- 7.7 High severity
- 7.1 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 7.1 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.