Linux: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization
CVE-2026-63874 is a high-severity concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization vulnerability in Linux, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8 out of 10. It can be exploited with local access to the system by an attacker with a low-privileged account, without any action from a user. The record lists versions 9c46f3ee1837f6881cb99a52ffecb2760f11dc73, d90feaa3f74bea8dafb6494631a194c70e547d94, 54665dce982689e2fd99b32e9a0dcc204fda8a51 as the first without the flaw, so updating Linux to one of those releases or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.13% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is low compared with other CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Update Linux to 9c46f3ee1837f6881cb99a52ffecb2760f11dc73 or d90feaa3f74bea8dafb6494631a194c70e547d94 or 54665dce982689e2fd99b32e9a0dcc204fda8a51, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
- Update Linux Kernel to 6.18.36 or 7.0.13, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 0791c0327a6e4e7691d6fc5ad334c215de04dcc9 up to, but not including, 9c46f3ee1837f6881cb99a52ffecb2760f11dc73; 0791c0327a6e4e7691d6fc5ad334c215de04dcc9 up to, but not including, d90feaa3f74bea8dafb6494631a194c70e547d94; 0791c0327a6e4e7691d6fc5ad334c215de04dcc9 up to, but not including, 54665dce982689e2fd99b32e9a0dcc204fda8a51; 6.15 | 9c46f3ee1837f6881cb99a52ffecb2760f11dc73, d90feaa3f74bea8dafb6494631a194c70e547d94, 54665dce982689e2fd99b32e9a0dcc204fda8a51 |
| Linux | Linux Kernel | 6.15 up to, but not including, 6.18.36; 6.19 up to, but not including, 7.0.13; 7.1 | 6.18.36, 7.0.13 |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- LocalThe attacker needs local access or must trick a user into running something.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- LowA basic user account is enough.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by CNA.
Official description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: mctp: usb: fix race between urb completion and rx_retry cancellation It's possible that sequencing between setting ->stopped and cancelling the rx_retry work (in ndo_stop) could leave us with an urb queued: T1: ndo_stop T2: rx_retry_work ------------ ---------------- LD: ->stopped => false ST: ->stopped <= true usb_kill_urb() mctp_usb_rx_queue() usb_submit_urb() cancel_delayed_work_sync() That urb completion can then re-schedule rx_retry_work. Strenghen the sequencing between the stop (preventing another requeue) and the cancel by updating both atomically under a new rx lock. After setting ->rx_stopped, and cancelling pending work, we know that the requeue cannot occur, so all that's left is killing any pending urb.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization
The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- In languages that support it, use synchronization primitives. Only wrap these around critical code to minimize the impact on performance.
- Use thread-safe capabilities such as the data access abstraction in Spring.
- Minimize the usage of shared resources in order to remove as much complexity as possible from the control flow and to reduce the likelihood of unexpected conditions occurring. Additionally, this will minimize the amount of synchronization necessary and may even help to reduce the likelihood of a denial of service where an attacker may be able to repeatedly trigger a critical section (CWE-400).
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Patches and release notes
Recent Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization vulnerabilities
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.