CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2026-64210NVD status: Modified

Linux: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization

Published Updated By the CyberSecBulletin desk

CVE-2026-64210 is a high-severity concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization vulnerability in Linux, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. The record lists versions 0c8f331485656d5937d56a488016b944a038fe2f, f3d8c2fd591bb603b069e151881a317e26a3f478, f37adef34eb7ebe29a534d20ccadd72bd7ff664e as the first without the flaw, so updating Linux to one of those releases or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.37% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is low compared with other CVEs.

Next patch cycle

High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.

What to do

  1. Update Linux to 0c8f331485656d5937d56a488016b944a038fe2f or f3d8c2fd591bb603b069e151881a317e26a3f478 or f37adef34eb7ebe29a534d20ccadd72bd7ff664e or 54a97ef1025236cc1bc54d79c7ae2eb8027ce4b8, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
  2. Update Linux Kernel to 7.0.11 or a later version.
  3. Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
LinuxLinuxdb05815b36cbd486c86fd002dfa81c9af6245e25 up to, but not including, 0c8f331485656d5937d56a488016b944a038fe2f; db05815b36cbd486c86fd002dfa81c9af6245e25 up to, but not including, f3d8c2fd591bb603b069e151881a317e26a3f478; db05815b36cbd486c86fd002dfa81c9af6245e25 up to, but not including, f37adef34eb7ebe29a534d20ccadd72bd7ff664e; db05815b36cbd486c86fd002dfa81c9af6245e25 up to, but not including, 54a97ef1025236cc1bc54d79c7ae2eb8027ce4b8; db05815b36cbd486c86fd002dfa81c9af6245e25 up to, but not including, 8d3b91e7d81000d295cd914d4d9d6f860252e2bf; db05815b36cbd486c86fd002dfa81c9af6245e25 up to, but not including, c326f9c68921e2f14dfcecb2f6b4216313d50248; 5.30c8f331485656d5937d56a488016b944a038fe2f, f3d8c2fd591bb603b069e151881a317e26a3f478, f37adef34eb7ebe29a534d20ccadd72bd7ff664e, 54a97ef1025236cc1bc54d79c7ae2eb8027ce4b8, 8d3b91e7d81000d295cd914d4d9d6f860252e2bf, c326f9c68921e2f14dfcecb2f6b4216313d50248
LinuxLinux Kernel5.3 up to, but not including, 7.0.11; 7.17.0.11

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
NoneNo account or login is needed.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
NoneNo data is disclosed.
Integrity
NoneNothing can be modified.
Availability
HighThe component can be taken down completely.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. Scored by CNA.

Official description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: xsk: Fix unlocked writing to ICOSQ During napi poll, when the affinity changes and there's still XSK work to be done, we trigger an ICOSQ interrupt on the new CPU. However, this triggering on the ICOSQ is done unprotected. There are 2 such races: A) mlx5e_trigger_irq() is called while mlx5e_xsk_alloc_rx_mpwqe() is running from a different CPU due to affinity change. This can happen because IRQ triggering is done after napi_complete_done(). At this point the NAPI can be scheduled on a different CPU. Like this: CPU A (old affinity, NAPI tail) CPU B (new affinity, fresh NAPI) ------------------------------- -------------------------------- napi_complete_done() clears SCHED mlx5e_cq_arm(...) napi_schedule_prep() sets SCHED mlx5e_napi_poll() mlx5e_xsk_alloc_rx_mpwqe() mlx5e_icosq_sync_lock() // noop memcpy 640 B UMR body advance sq->pc by 10 mlx5e_trigger_irq(&c->icosq) wqe_info[pi] = {NOP, 1} mlx5e_post_nop() advances sq->pc B) mlx5e_trigger_irq() is called on the ICOSQ when mlx5e_trigger_napi_icosq() is running. The obvious fix would be to lock the ICOSQ. But ICOSQ has an optimized locking scheme that doesn't work for this scenario. Kick the async ICOSQ instead which is always locked. This issue was noticed in the wild with the following splat: netdevice: ge-0-0-1: Bad OP in ICOSQ CQE: 0xd WARNING: drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c:826 [...] [...] Call Trace: <IRQ> mlx5e_napi_poll+0x11d/0x7f0 [mlx5_core] __napi_poll+0x30/0x200 ? skb_defer_free_flush+0x9c/0xc0 net_rx_action+0x2fe/0x3f0 handle_softirqs+0xd8/0x340 __irq_exit_rcu+0xbc/0xe0 common_interrupt+0x85/0xa0 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 [...] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- mlx5_core 0000:08:00.0 ge-0-0-1: Error cqe on cqn 0x548, ci 0x2022, qn 0x8f4, opcode 0xd, syndrome 0x2, vendor syndrome 0x68 00000000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00000010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00000030: 00 00 00 00 01 00 68 02 01 00 08 f4 de 14 59 d2 WQE DUMP: WQ size 16384 WQ cur size 0, WQE index 0x1e14, len: 64 00000000: 00 00 00 01 d9 ed 80 02 00 00 00 01 d9 ed 90 02 00000010: 00 00 00 01 d9 ed a0 02 00 00 00 01 d9 ed b0 02 00000020: 00 00 00 01 d9 ed c0 02 00 00 00 01 d9 ed d0 02 00000030: 00 00 00 01 d9 ed e0 02 00 00 00 01 d9 ed f0 02 mlx5_core 0000:08:00.0 ge-0-0-1: Error cqe on cqn 0x548, ci 0x2023, qn 0x8f4, opcode 0xd, syndrome 0x5, vendor syndrome 0xf9 00000000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00000010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00000030: 00 00 00 00 01 00 f9 05 01 00 08 f4 de 15 cf d2

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How developers prevent this class of flaw

  • In languages that support it, use synchronization primitives. Only wrap these around critical code to minimize the impact on performance.
  • Use thread-safe capabilities such as the data access abstraction in Spring.
  • Minimize the usage of shared resources in order to remove as much complexity as possible from the control flow and to reduce the likelihood of unexpected conditions occurring. Additionally, this will minimize the amount of synchronization necessary and may even help to reduce the likelihood of a denial of service where an attacker may be able to repeatedly trigger a critical section (CWE-400).

More Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization vulnerabilities (CWE-362)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: yes, technical impact: partial).
  3. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Recent Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.