shell-quote: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command
CVE-2026-9277 is a high-severity improper neutralization of special elements used in a command vulnerability in shell-quote, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.1 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. The record lists version 1.8.4 as the first without the flaw, so updating shell-quote to that release or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.79% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 57% of scored CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Update shell-quote to 1.8.4 or a later version.
- Read the advisory on github.com for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Affected products and versions
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 24 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- HighSuccess depends on conditions outside the attacker's control.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by CNA.
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 4.0 | 9.2 | Critical | CNA |
| CVSS 3.1 | 8.1 | High | CNA |
| CVSS 3.1 | 8.1 | High | CNA |
Official description
shell-quote's `quote()` function did not validate object-token inputs against the operator model used by `parse()`. The `.op` field was backslash-escaped character by character using `/(.)/g`, which in JavaScript does not match line terminators (\n, \r, U+2028, U+2029). A line terminator in `.op` therefore passed through unescaped into the output; POSIX shells treat a literal newline as a command separator, so any content after it would execute as a second command. The vulnerable code path is reachable in two ways: (1) direct construction of `{ op: '...\n...' }` from external input, and (2) via `parse(cmd, envFn)` when `envFn` returns object tokens whose `.op` is attacker-influenced. Both are documented API surface. Fixed by replacing the per-character escape with strict shape validation: `.op` must match the parser's control-operator allowlist; `{ op: 'glob', pattern }` validates `pattern` and forbids line terminators; `{ comment }` validates `comment` and forbids line terminators; any other object shape throws `TypeError`.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
- If possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
- Run time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
More Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command vulnerabilities (CWE-77)
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: total).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Patches and release notes
Other references
- github.com/ljharb/shell-quote
- npmjs.com/package/shell-quote
- openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/23/2
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26072
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26077
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26079
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26080
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26090
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:26225
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28010
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:28571
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29197
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29795
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:29834
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30076
Other vulnerabilities in shell-quote
- 8.1 High severity
Recent Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command vulnerabilities
- 7.5 High severity
- 9.3 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 8.4 High severity
- 9.1 Critical severity
- 7.8 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.