CyberSecBulletin

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

CWE-120

The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.

We track 2,043 vulnerabilities of this type. 100% are rated high or critical, and the average CVSS score is 8.6. 24 have been exploited in real attacks.

How this weakness is prevented

  • Requirements: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega, and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
  • Operation Build and Compilation: Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND discusses canary-based detection in detail.
  • Architecture and Design: For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
  • Operation: Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (using hardware NX or XD bits) or the equivalent techniques that simulate this feature in software, such as PaX. These techniques ensure that any instruction executed is exclusively at a memory address that is part of the code segment. For more information on these techniques see D3-PSEP (Process Segment Execution Prevention) from D3FEND.

Latest Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input vulnerabilities

  • 9.8 Critical severity

    ThreadX: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

    CVE-2024-2452Eclipse Foundation

    In Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before 6.4.0, if an attacker can control parameters of __portable_aligned_alloc() could cause an integer wrap-around and an allocation smaller than expected. This could cause subsequent heap buffer overflows.

  • 8.1 High severity

    azure-c-shared-utility: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-29195AzureEPSS 5.01%

    The azure-c-shared-utility is a C library for AMQP/MQTT communication to Azure Cloud Services. This library may be used by the Azure IoT C SDK for communication between IoT Hub and IoT Hub devices. An attacker can cause an integer wraparound or under-allocatio

  • 7.5 High severity

    Readymedia: Out-of-bounds Write

    CVE-2023-47430Readymedia Project

    Stack-buffer-overflow vulnerability in ReadyMedia (MiniDLNA) v1.3.3 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via via the SendContainer() function at tivo_commands.c.

  • 7.8 High severity

    freeimage: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-28583Freeimage Project

    Buffer Overflow vulnerability in open source FreeImage v.3.19.0 [r1909] allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the readLine() function when reading images in XPM format.

  • 7.8 High severity

    freeimage: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-28569Freeimage Project

    Buffer Overflow vulnerability in open source FreeImage v.3.19.0 [r1909] allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Imf_2_2::Xdr::read() function when reading images in EXR format.

  • 7.8 High severity

    Linux: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-52614Linux

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: PM / devfreq: Fix buffer overflow in trans_stat_show Fix buffer overflow in trans_stat_show(). Convert simple snprintf to the more secure scnprintf with size of PAGE_SIZE. Add condition checki

  • 7.8 High severity

    Linux: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-52612Linux

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: scomp - fix req->dst buffer overflow The req->dst buffer size should be checked before copying from the scomp_scratch->dst to avoid req->dst buffer overflow problem.

  • 9.8 Critical severity

    x5000r_firmware: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-28639TOTOLINKEPSS 1.24%

    Buffer Overflow vulnerability in TOTOLink X5000R V9.1.0u.6118-B20201102 and A7000R V9.1.0u.6115-B20201022, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and cause a denial of service (DoS) via the IP field.

  • 10.0 Critical severity

    omada_er605: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-25139TP-Link

    In TP-Link Omada er605 1.0.1 through (v2.6) 2.2.3, a cloud-brd binary is susceptible to an integer overflow that leads to a heap-based buffer overflow. After heap shaping, an attacker can achieve code execution in the context of the cloud-brd binary that runs

  • 9.8 Critical severity

    Cerberus PRO EN Engineering Tool: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-22039Siemens

    A vulnerability has been identified in Cerberus PRO EN Engineering Tool (All versions < IP8), Cerberus PRO EN Fire Panel FC72x IP6 (All versions < IP6 SR3), Cerberus PRO EN Fire Panel FC72x IP7 (All versions < IP7 SR5), Cerberus PRO EN X200 Cloud Distribution

  • 9.8 Critical severity

    Tourist Reservation System: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-2331SourceCodester

    A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Tourist Reservation System 1.0. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects the function ad_writedata of the file System.cpp. The manipulation of the argument ad_code leads to buffer overflow. The at

  • 7.8 High severity

    iOS and iPadOS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-23286AppleEPSS 1.24%

    A buffer overflow issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 16.7.6 and iPadOS 16.7.6, iOS 17.4 and iPadOS 17.4, macOS Monterey 12.7.4, macOS Sonoma 14.4, macOS Ventura 13.6.5, tvOS 17.4, visionOS 1.1, watchOS 10.4. Processin

  • 7.8 High severity

    eza: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-25817Eza

    Buffer Overflow vulnerability in eza before version 0.18.2, allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code via the .git/HEAD, .git/refs, and .git/objects components.

  • 7.5 High severity

    Sterling Connect:Express for UNIX: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-32331IBM

    IBM Connect:Express for UNIX 1.5.0 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow that could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service through its browser UI. IBM X-Force ID: 254979.

  • 7.8 High severity

    Dell Digital Delivery (D3): Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-0156Dell

    Dell Digital Delivery, versions prior to 5.2.0.0, contain a Buffer Overflow Vulnerability. A local low privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary code execution and/or privilege escalation.

  • 7.5 High severity

    lbt-t300-t390_firmware: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-27572Szlbt

    LBT T300-T390 v2.2.1.8 were discovered to contain a stack overflow via the ApCliSsid parameter in the updateCurAPlist function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted POST request.

  • 8.6 High severity

    Cisco NX-OS Software: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-20267Cisco

    A vulnerability with the handling of MPLS traffic for Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the netstack process to unexpectedly restart, which could cause the device to stop processing network traffic or to reload. This

  • 7.5 High severity

    DIR-600M C1: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-1786D-LinkEPSS 2.74%

    ** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in D-Link DIR-600M C1 3.08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Telnet Service. The manipulation of the argument username leads

  • 7.5 High severity

    wireshark: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-24479Wireshark FoundationEPSS 1.31%

    A Buffer Overflow in Wireshark before 4.2.0 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the wsutil/to_str.c, and format_fractional_part_nsecs components. NOTE: this is disputed by the vendor because neither release 4.2.0 nor any other release was

  • 8.8 High severity

    qemu: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-24474QEMUEPSS 1.4%

    QEMU before 8.2.0 has an integer underflow, and resultant buffer overflow, via a TI command when an expected non-DMA transfer length is less than the length of the available FIFO data. This occurs in esp_do_nodma in hw/scsi/esp.c because of an underflow of asy

  • 7.5 High severity

    cbor2: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-26134AgronholmEPSS 1.17%

    cbor2 provides encoding and decoding for the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) (RFC 8949) serialization format. Starting in version 5.5.1 and prior to version 5.6.2, an attacker can crash a service using cbor2 to parse a CBOR binary by sending a long

  • 7.4 High severity

    HarmonyOS: Out-of-bounds Read

    CVE-2023-52377Huawei

    Vulnerability of input data not being verified in the cellular data module.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause out-of-bounds access.

  • 7.5 High severity

    HarmonyOS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-52366Huawei

    Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the smart activity recognition module.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause features to perform abnormally.

  • 7.8 High severity

    Substance3D - Painter: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-20723Adobe

    Substance3D - Painter versions 9.1.1 and earlier are affected by a Buffer Overflow vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a

  • 8.2 High severity

    FreeBSD: Out-of-bounds Write

    CVE-2022-23085FreeBSD

    A user-provided integer option was passed to nmreq_copyin() without checking if it would overflow. This insufficient bounds checking could lead to kernel memory corruption. On systems configured to include netmap in their devfs_ruleset, a privileged process ru

  • 7.2 High severity

    QTS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-45037QNAP

    A buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute code via a network. We have already fixed the vul

  • 7.2 High severity

    QTS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-45036QNAP

    A buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute code via a network. We have already fixed the vul

  • 7.2 High severity

    QTS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-45035QNAP

    A buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute code via a network. We have already fixed the vul

  • 7.2 High severity

    QTS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-41292QNAP

    A buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute code via a network. We have already fixed the vul

  • 7.2 High severity

    QTS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-41280QNAP

    A buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute code via a network. We have already fixed the vul

  • 7.2 High severity

    QTS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-41279QNAP

    A buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute code via a network. We have already fixed the vul

  • 7.2 High severity

    QTS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-41278QNAP

    A buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute code via a network. We have already fixed the vul

  • 7.2 High severity

    QTS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-41277QNAP

    A buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute code via a network. We have already fixed the vul

  • 7.2 High severity

    QTS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-41276QNAP

    A buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute code via a network. We have already fixed the vul

  • 7.2 High severity

    QTS: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2023-41275QNAP

    A buffer copy without checking size of input vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute code via a network. We have already fixed the vul

  • 7.2 High severity

    QTS: Out-of-bounds Write

    CVE-2023-41273QNAP

    A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow authenticated administrators to execute code via a network. We have already fixed the vulnerability in th

  • 9.8 Critical severity

    XAMPP: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-0338Apachefriends

    A buffer overflow vulnerability has been found in XAMPP affecting version 8.2.4 and earlier. An attacker could execute arbitrary code through a long file debug argument that controls the Structured Exception Handler (SEH).

  • 7.5 High severity

    Ypops!: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-24736YpopsemailEPSS 1.18%

    The POP3 service in YahooPOPs (aka YPOPs!) 1.6 allows a remote denial of service (reboot) via a long string to TCP port 110, a related issue to CVE-2004-1558.

  • 9.8 Critical severity

    eFilm Workstation: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-23621IBM Merge HealthcareEPSS 1.85%

    A buffer overflow exists in IBM Merge Healthcare eFilm Workstation license server. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to achieve remote code execution.

  • 8.8 High severity

    Data Loss Prevention: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input

    CVE-2024-23617SymantecEPSS 1.66%

    A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Symantec Data Loss Prevention version 14.0.2 and before. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by enticing a user to open a crafted document to achieve code execution.