Cross-Site Request Forgery
CWE-352
The web application does not, or cannot, sufficiently verify whether a request was intentionally provided by the user who sent the request, which could have originated from an unauthorized actor.
We track 2,014 vulnerabilities of this type. 100% are rated high or critical, and the average CVSS score is 8.1. 6 have been exploited in real attacks.
How this weakness is prevented
- Architecture and Design: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, use anti-CSRF packages such as the OWASP CSRFGuard. Another example is the ESAPI Session Management control, which includes a component for CSRF.
- Implementation: Ensure that the application is free of cross-site scripting issues (CWE-79), because most CSRF defenses can be bypassed using attacker-controlled script.
- Architecture and Design: Generate a unique nonce for each form, place the nonce into the form, and verify the nonce upon receipt of the form. Be sure that the nonce is not predictable (CWE-330).
- Architecture and Design: Identify especially dangerous operations. When the user performs a dangerous operation, send a separate confirmation request to ensure that the user intended to perform that operation.
- Architecture and Design: Do not use the GET method for any request that triggers a state change.
Latest Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities
- 8.8 High severity
Memberpress: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The MemberPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.14.1. This is due to a bypassable nonce verification check in the save_profile_fields() function that uses an isset() condition at line 1119, a
- 8.8 High severity
VikRentCar Car Rental Management System: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The VikRentCar Car Rental Management System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the condtext_update_tmpl function. This makes it p
- 9.6 Critical severity
Newsletters: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tribulant Software Newsletters newsletters-lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Newsletters: from n/a through 4.18.2.
- 8.8 High severity
core: Cross-Site Request Forgery
REDAXO before 5.21.3 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the backend user administration page (users/users) because the CSRF token check only runs when the save parameter is set, while the update path triggered by FUNC_UPDATE does not requir
- 7.1 High severity
SemanticMediaWiki: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Semantic MediaWiki from 3.0.0 before 7.3.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Special:SMWAdmin because it overwrites the wpEditToken with a freshly generated valid token. Attackers can lure an authenticated smw-admin user to a malicious pag
- 7.1 High severity
airMAX M: Cross-Site Request Forgery
A malicious actor who lures an authenticated user to a malicious page could exploit a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability found in airMAX M devices to make unauthorized changes and execute a Denial of Service (DoS) attack on the device.
- 8.8 High severity
airMAX M: Cross-Site Request Forgery
A malicious actor who lures an authenticated user to a malicious page could exploit a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability found in airMAX M devices to execute a Command Injection on the device.
- 8.8 High severity
FunnelKit Automations: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Aman FunnelKit Automations wp-marketing-automations allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects FunnelKit Automations: from n/a through 3.8.5.2.
- 8.1 High severity
yeswiki: Cross-Site Request Forgery
YesWiki before 4.7.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the despam action (tools/security/actions/despam.php) that lets unauthenticated attackers delete or restore pages through an administrator's session. Attackers can plant an auto-submit
- 8.6 High severity
Uni-CLI: Origin Validation Error
Uni-CLI gives people and agents one command interface for websites, browsers, desktop applications, local tools, and MCP. Prior to version 0.225.2, Uni-CLI exposed the legacy JSON-RPC-over-HTTP MCP transport on loopback without validating browser Origin header
- 7.1 High severity
Zimbra Collaboration Suite: Cross-Site Request Forgery
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the OAuth extension of Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) Network Edition allows an attacker to link an attacker-controlled external account to a victim's mailbox. The OAuth callback does not bind its state value or
- 8.6 High severity
Router: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command (“OS Command Injection”) and Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in an ASUS router model allow an attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into visiting a phishing website, causing the router t
- 8.8 High severity
Xpro Elementor Addons: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Xpro Xpro Elementor Addons xpro-elementor-addons allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Xpro Elementor Addons: from n/a through 1.7.10.
- 8.1 High severity
obot: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Obot before 0.26.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the CLI login flow that allows unauthenticated attackers to steal API keys by choosing token request IDs. Attackers can create a token request via POST /api/token-request, send the login lin
- 7.5 High severity
Uncanny Toolkit for LearnDash: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Uncanny Toolkit for LearnDash WordPress plugin before 3.8.2 does not validate the origin of a password-reset request, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to set the password of a user who is partway through a password reset to an attacker-chosen value thr
- 8.8 High severity
trigger.dev: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Trigger.dev before 4.5.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the CLI authorization-code flow because loading /account/authorization-code/<code> mints a Personal Access Token without any consent step. Attackers mint an unauthenticated code, l
- 8.7 High severity
Oracle Applications Framework: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Vulnerability in the Oracle Applications Framework product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Personalization). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via
- 7.6 High severity
Oracle Trusted Answer Search: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Vulnerability in Oracle Trusted Answer Search (component: Application expert UI). The supported version that is affected is 26.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Trusted Answer S
- 8.8 High severity
Siebel CRM Development: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Development product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Siebel Approval Manager). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to
- 8.7 High severity
Siebel Life Sciences: Improper Access Control
Vulnerability in the Siebel Life Sciences product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Web UI). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Li
- 7.1 High severity
Siebel CRM Development: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Vulnerability in the Siebel CRM Development product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Workflow). Supported versions that are affected are 25.12-26.9. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Si
- 8.8 High severity
VikRentCar: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in e4jvikwp VikRentCar vikrentcar allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects VikRentCar: from n/a through 1.4.8.
- 8.8 High severity
Apache Airflow Amazon provider: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Apache Airflow Amazon provider: the AWS auth manager's SAML login flow does not bind the authentication response to the browser that began it. The login handler discards the AuthnRequest ID and the callback validates the assertion without requiring a matching
- 8.1 High severity
Gitea: Cross-Site Request Forgery
`POST /{owner}/{repo}/topics` was registered without the sign-in middleware that provides the cross-origin protection, so a request issued by a third-party site was not rejected. A repository administrator who visited a malicious page could have the topics of
- 7.1 High severity
phpMyFAQ: Cross-Site Request Forgery
phpMyFAQ 4.0.0 before 4.1.9 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the POST /admin/api/update-database endpoint, which executes database migrations without validating a CSRF token. Attackers can lure a logged-in user with the CONFIGURATION_EDIT
- 8.1 High severity
openhuman: Cross-Site Request Forgery
OpenHuman is an open-source agent harness available as a desktop application and Rust library. Versions before 0.56.0 allow cross-site request forgery against the unauthenticated GET /auth/telegram loopback callback because telegram_auth_handler consumes an at
- 8.8 High severity
aThemeArt Theme Helper: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in aThemeArt aThemeArt Theme Helper athemeart-theme-helper allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects aThemeArt Theme Helper: from n/a through 1.0.8.
- 8.8 High severity
Salon Booking System: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Salon Booking System WordPress plugin before 10.31.9 does not correctly verify the authenticity of REST API requests and discards WordPress core's nonce check for cookie-authenticated sessions across the whole REST API, allowing unauthenticated attackers w
- 7.1 High severity
nginx-ui: Improper Authentication
Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. Prior to 2.4.1, GetCasdoorUri uses the configured Casdoor application name as a constant OAuth state value and CasdoorCallback does not compare the submitted state with a value bound to the initiating
- 8.1 High severity
ConvertX: Cross-Site Request Forgery
ConvertX is a self-hosted file conversion service. Prior to 0.18.0, the /delete/{id} endpoint uses HTTP GET for permanent deletion without CSRF protection. If an authenticated user visits attacker-controlled content that requests /delete/{id}, the browser send
- 7.4 High severity
Patreon WordPress: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Patreon Patreon WordPress patreon-connect allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Patreon WordPress: from n/a through 1.10.0.
- 8.1 High severity
Patreon WordPress: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Patreon Patreon WordPress patreon-connect allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Patreon WordPress: from n/a through 1.9.17.
- 7.5 High severity
MarkLogic Server: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Progress MarkLogic Server 12.x releases before 12.1.0 and 11.x releases before 11.3.7 use predictable CSRF tokens in Query Console. A remote attacker who lures an authenticated Query Console user to a malicious page could submit unauthorized requests and execu
- 7.5 High severity
OpenRefine: Cross-Site Request Forgery
OpenRefine through 3.10.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the get-rows command that allows remote attackers to execute Jython facet expressions. Attackers can lure a user to a malicious page issuing a cross-origin GET with a crafted engi
- 8.8 High severity
nginx-ui: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Nginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. From 2.0.0 until 2.5.0, AuthRequired accepts a browser-managed token cookie as an API credential after the front end stores the JWT in that cookie. Because management endpoints do not universally requi
- 7.1 High severity
Dashboard Notes: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MIGHTYminnow Dashboard Notes dashboard-notes allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Dashboard Notes: from n/a through 1.0.3.
- 8.8 High severity
Featured Image from URL: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in fifu.app Featured Image from URL featured-image-from-url allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Featured Image from URL: from n/a through 6.0.7.
- 8.8 High severity
Security Verify Access: Cross-Site Request Forgery
IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website
- 7.1 High severity
Malcolm: Cross-Site Request Forgery
The Malcolm kiosk Flask application exposes a POST /script_call/<script> endpoint with zero authentication and wildcard CORS (CORS(app)). An attacker can force the operator's browser to execute arbitrary management commands via CSRF, including control.py --wip
- 7.6 High severity
pydantic-ai: Cross-Site Request Forgery
Pydantic AI is a Python agent framework for building applications and workflows with Generative AI. From 1.34.0 until 1.107.4 and 2.28.0, the Agent.to_web() and clai web development chat endpoint has missing request content-type validation. A website visited b