Server receiving a malformed message to create a new connection could lead to an attacker…
CVE-2023-5397 is a high-severity improper input validation vulnerability in Experion Server from Honeywell, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.1 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected Experion Server versions: 520.2 through 520.2 TCU4; 510.1 through 510.2 HF13; 520.1 through 520.1 TCU4, and others listed below. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.77% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 56% of scored CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Check which version of Experion Server you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honeywell | Experion Server | 520.2 through 520.2 TCU4; 510.1 through 510.2 HF13; 520.1 through 520.1 TCU4; 511.1 through 511.5 TCU4 HF3; 520.2 TCU4 HFR2 through 511.5 TCU4 HF3; 520.2 through 520.2_tcu4; 510.1 through 510.2_hf13; 520.1 through 520.1_tcu4; and 2 more ranges | Not stated |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- HighSuccess depends on conditions outside the attacker's control.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by CNA (honeywell.com).
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 8.1 | High | CNA (honeywell.com) |
| CVSS 3.1 | 8.1 | High | CISA (ADP) |
Official description
Server receiving a malformed message to create a new connection could lead to an attacker performing remote code execution or causing a failure. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build recognizers for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subject to errors or inconsistencies that create weaknesses.
- Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
- Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: total).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Other references
Other vulnerabilities in Experion Server
- 8.1 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 7.4 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
Recent Improper Input Validation vulnerabilities
- 7.2 High severity
- 8.0 High severity
- 7.2 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.1 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.