A specific malformed fragmented packet type (fragmented packets may be generated automatically…
CVE-2024-3493 is a high-severity improper input validation vulnerability in ControlLogix 5580 from Rockwell Automation, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected ControlLogix 5580 versions: v35.011. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.64% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 51% of scored CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Check which version of ControlLogix 5580 you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell Automation | ControlLogix 5580 | v35.011 | Not stated |
| Rockwell Automation | GuardLogix 5580 | v35.011 | Not stated |
| Rockwell Automation | CompactLogix 5380 | v5.001 | Not stated |
| Rockwell Automation | 1756-EN4TR | v5.001 | Not stated |
| Rockwell Automation | guardlogix_5580_firmware | 35.011 | Not stated |
| Rockwell Automation | compactlogix_5380_firmware | 35.011 | Not stated |
| Rockwell Automation | 1756-en4tr_firmware | 5.001 | Not stated |
| Rockwell Automation | Controllogix 5580 Firmware | 35.011 | Not stated |
| Rockwell Automation | Compact Guardlogix 5380 Firmware | 35.011 | Not stated |
| Rockwell Automation | Controllogix 5580 Process Firmware | 35.011 | Not stated |
| Rockwell Automation | Compactlogix 5380 Process Firmware | 35.011 | Not stated |
| Rockwell Automation | Compactlogix 5480 Firmware | 35.011 | Not stated |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- NoneNo data is disclosed.
- Integrity
- NoneNothing can be modified.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. Scored by NVD.
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 8.6 | High | CNA (rockwellautomation.com) |
| CVSS 3.1 | 7.5 | High | NVD |
Official description
A specific malformed fragmented packet type (fragmented packets may be generated automatically by devices that send large amounts of data) can cause a major nonrecoverable fault (MNRF) Rockwell Automation's ControlLogix 5580, Guard Logix 5580, CompactLogix 5380, and 1756-EN4TR. If exploited, the affected product will become unavailable and require a manual restart to recover it. Additionally, an MNRF could result in a loss of view and/or control of connected devices.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build recognizers for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subject to errors or inconsistencies that create weaknesses.
- Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
- Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: yes, technical impact: partial).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
Other vulnerabilities in ControlLogix 5580
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
Recent Improper Input Validation vulnerabilities
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.1 High severity
- 7.2 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 9.0 Critical severity
- 7.5 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.