CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2024-6207NVD status: Analyzed

CVE 2021-22681 https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/adviso…

CVE-2024-6207 is a high-severity improper input validation vulnerability in ControlLogix® 5580 from Rockwell Automation, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected ControlLogix® 5580 versions: V28.011. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.55% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is low compared with other CVEs.

Next patch cycle

High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.

What to do

  1. Update FactoryTalk® Logix Echo to 34.014 or 35.013 or 36.011, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
  2. Update compactlogix_5380_firmware to 33.017 or 34.014 or 35.013 or 36.011, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
  3. Update controllogix_5580_process_firmware to 33.017 or 34.014 or 35.013 or 36.011, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
  4. Read the advisory on rockwellautomation.com for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
  5. Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
Rockwell AutomationControlLogix® 5580V28.011Not stated
Rockwell AutomationControlLogix® 5580 ProcessV33.011Not stated
Rockwell AutomationGuardLogix 5580V31.011Not stated
Rockwell AutomationCompactLogix 5380V28.011Not stated
Rockwell AutomationCompact GuardLogix 5380 SIL 2V31.011Not stated
Rockwell AutomationCompact GuardLogix 5380 SIL 3V32.013Not stated
Rockwell AutomationCompactLogix 5480V32.011Not stated
Rockwell AutomationFactoryTalk® Logix EchoV33.011; 33.011 up to, but not including, 34.014; 35.0 up to, but not including, 35.013; 36.0 up to, but not including, 36.01134.014, 35.013, 36.011
Rockwell Automationcompactlogix_5380_firmware28.011 up to, but not including, 33.017; 34.0 up to, but not including, 34.014; 35.0 up to, but not including, 35.013; 36.0 up to, but not including, 36.01133.017, 34.014, 35.013, 36.011
Rockwell Automationcontrollogix_5580_process_firmware33.011 up to, but not including, 33.017; 34.0 up to, but not including, 34.014; 35.0 up to, but not including, 35.013; 36.0 up to, but not including, 36.011; 32.011 up to, but not including, 33.01733.017, 34.014, 35.013, 36.011
Rockwell Automationguardlogix_5580_firmware31.011 up to, but not including, 33.017; 34.0 up to, but not including, 34.014; 35.0 up to, but not including, 35.013; 36.0 up to, but not including, 36.01133.017, 34.014, 35.013, 36.011
Rockwell Automationcompact_guardlogix_5380_sil3_firmware32.013 up to, but not including, 33.017; 34.0 up to, but not including, 34.014; 35.0 up to, but not including, 35.013; 36.0 up to, but not including, 36.01133.017, 34.014, 35.013, 36.011
Rockwell AutomationControllogix 5580 Firmware28.011 up to, but not including, 33.017; 34.011 up to, but not including, 34.014; 35.011 up to, but not including, 35.01333.017, 34.014, 35.013
Rockwell AutomationCompact Guardlogix 5380 Sil 2 Firmware31.011 up to, but not including, 33.017; 34.011 up to, but not including, 34.014; 35.011 up to, but not including, 35.01333.017, 34.014, 35.013
Rockwell AutomationCompact Guardlogix 5380 Sil 3 Firmware32.013 up to, but not including, 33.017; 34.011 up to, but not including, 34.014; 35.011 up to, but not including, 35.01333.017, 34.014, 35.013
Rockwell AutomationCompactlogix 5480 Firmware32.011 up to, but not including, 33.017; 34.011 up to, but not including, 34.014; 35.011 up to, but not including, 35.01333.017, 34.014, 35.013
Rockwell AutomationFactorytalk Logix Echo Firmware33.011 up to, but not including, 34.014; 35.011 up to, but not including, 35.01334.014, 35.013

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
NoneNo account or login is needed.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
NoneNo data is disclosed.
Integrity
NoneNothing can be modified.
Availability
HighThe component can be taken down completely.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. Scored by NVD.

Scoring systemScoreSeverityScored by
CVSS 4.08.7HighCNA (rockwellautomation.com)
CVSS 3.17.5HighCNA (rockwellautomation.com)
CVSS 3.17.5HighNVD

Official description

CVE 2021-22681 https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/advisory.PN1550.html and send a specially crafted CIP message to the device. If exploited, a threat actor could help prevent access to the legitimate user and end connections to connected devices including the workstation. To recover the controllers, a download is required which ends any process that the controller is running.

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Improper Input Validation

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

How developers prevent this class of flaw

  • Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build recognizers for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subject to errors or inconsistencies that create weaknesses.
  • Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
  • Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.

More Improper Input Validation vulnerabilities (CWE-20)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: yes, technical impact: partial).
  3. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Other vulnerabilities in ControlLogix® 5580

All ControlLogix® 5580 vulnerabilities

Recent Improper Input Validation vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.