An issue exists in all supported versions of IdentityIQ Lifecycle Manager that can result if…
CVE-2024-1714 is a high-severity improper input validation vulnerability in IdentityIQ from SailPoint, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.1 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an attacker with a low-privileged account, but only if a user takes part, for example by opening a link or file. The record lists versions 8.2p7, 8.3p4, 8.4p1 as the first without the flaw, so updating IdentityIQ to one of those releases or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.34% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is low compared with other CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Update IdentityIQ to 8.2p7 or 8.3p4 or 8.4p1, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
- Read the advisory on sailpoint.com for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
- Because the attack needs a user to take part, warn users about unexpected links and files related to this product until it is patched.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| SailPoint | IdentityIQ | 8.2 up to, but not including, 8.2p7; 8.3 up to, but not including, 8.3p4; 8.4 up to, but not including, 8.4p1 | 8.2p7, 8.3p4, 8.4p1 |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- HighSuccess depends on conditions outside the attacker's control.
- Privileges required
- LowA basic user account is enough.
- User interaction
- RequiredA user must take an action such as opening a file or link.
- Scope
- ChangedThe attack can reach beyond the vulnerable component into other systems.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- LowLimited modification of data is possible.
- Availability
- LowPerformance or availability is reduced.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L. Scored by CNA (sailpoint.com).
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 7.1 | High | CNA (sailpoint.com) |
| CVSS 3.1 | 7.1 | High | CISA (ADP) |
Official description
An issue exists in all supported versions of IdentityIQ Lifecycle Manager that can result if an entitlement with a value containing leading or trailing whitespace is requested by an authenticated user in an access request.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Improper Input Validation
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build recognizers for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subject to errors or inconsistencies that create weaknesses.
- Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
- Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: partial).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Advisories
Other vulnerabilities in IdentityIQ
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
Recent Improper Input Validation vulnerabilities
- 7.5 High severity
- 9.1 Critical severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 7.7 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.