HL-L8260CDN: Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
CVE-2024-51982 is a high-severity improper validation of syntactic correctness of input vulnerability in HL-L8260CDN from Brother Industries, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected HL-L8260CDN versions: 1.65(ZH) and earlier. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 10.7% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is in the top 4.1% of all scored CVEs.
EPSS places it among the vulnerabilities most likely to be exploited soon.
What to do
- Check which version of HL-L8260CDN you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brother Industries | HL-L8260CDN | 1.65(ZH) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L8260CDW | 1.65(ZH) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L8360CDW | 1.68(ZG) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L8360CDWT | 1.68(ZG) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L9310CDW | 1.68(ZG) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | DCP-L8410CDW | ZK and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | MFC-L8610CDW | ZK and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | MFC-L8690CDW | ZK and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | MFC-L8900CDW | ZM and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | MFC-L9570CDW | ZM and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | MFC-L9577CDW | ZM and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2325DW | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2350DW | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2351DW | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2352DW | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2357DW | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2370DN | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2371DN | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2372DN | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-2590DN | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2370DW | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2370DWXL | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2375DW | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-L2376DW | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
| Brother Industries | HL-B2050DN | 1.74(ZE) and earlier | Not stated |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 35 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- NoneNo data is disclosed.
- Integrity
- NoneNothing can be modified.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. Scored by CNA (rapid7.com).
Official description
An unauthenticated attacker who can connect to TCP port 9100 can issue a Printer Job Language (PJL) command that will crash the target device. The device will reboot, after which the attacker can reissue the command to repeatedly crash the device. A malformed PJL variable FORMLINES is set to a non number value causing the target to crash.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input
The product receives input that is expected to be well-formed - i.e., to comply with a certain syntax - but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input complies with the syntax.
More Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerabilities (CWE-1286)
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: poc, automatable: yes, technical impact: partial).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Other references
- assets.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt6495b3c6adf2867f/685aa980a26c5e2b1026969c/vulnerabili…
- github.com/sfewer-r7/BrotherVulnerabilities
- support.brother.com/g/b/link.aspx?prod=group2&faqid=faq00100846_000
- fujifilm.com/fbglobal/eng/company/news/notice/2025/0625_announce.html
- rapid7.com/blog/post/multiple-brother-devices-multiple-vulnerabilities-fixed
- ricoh.com/products/security/vulnerabilities/vul?id=ricoh-2025-000007
Other vulnerabilities in HL-L8260CDN
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.2 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
Recent Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input vulnerabilities
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.3 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.