PT-7728 Series: Out-of-bounds Write
CVE-2024-7695 is a high-severity out-of-bounds write vulnerability in PT-7728 Series from Moxa, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.5 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected PT-7728 Series versions: 1.0 through 3.9. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.72% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 54% of scored CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Check which version of PT-7728 Series you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
- Read the advisory on moxa.com for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxa | PT-7728 Series | 1.0 through 3.9 | Not stated |
| Moxa | PT-7828 Series | 1.0 through 4.0 | Not stated |
| Moxa | PT-G503 Series | 1.0 through 5.3 | Not stated |
| Moxa | PT-G510 Series | 1.0 through 6.5 | Not stated |
| Moxa | PT-G7728 Series | 1.0 through 6.4 | Not stated |
| Moxa | PT-G7828 Series | 1.0 through 6.4 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-608 Series | 1.0 through 3.12 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-611 Series | 1.0 through 3.12 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-616 Series | 1.0 through 3.12 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-619 Series | 1.0 through 3.12 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-405A Series | 1.0 through 3.14 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-408A Series | 1.0 through 3.12 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-505A Series | 1.0 through 3.11 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-508A Series | 1.0 through 3.11 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-510A Series | 1.0 through 3.12 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-516A Series | 1.0 through 3.11 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-518A Series | 1.0 through 3.11 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-G509 Series | 1.0 through 3.10 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-P510 Series | 1.0 through 3.11 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-P510A Series | 1.0 through 3.11 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-510E Series | 1.0 through 5.5 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-518E Series | 1.0 through 6.3 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-528E Series | 1.0 through 6.3 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-G508E Series | 1.0 through 6.4 | Not stated |
| Moxa | EDS-G512E Series | 1.0 through 6.4 | Not stated |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 26 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- NoneNo data is disclosed.
- Integrity
- NoneNothing can be modified.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H. Scored by CNA (moxa.com).
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 4.0 | 8.7 | High | CNA (moxa.com) |
| CVSS 3.1 | 7.5 | High | CNA (moxa.com) |
Official description
Multiple switches are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability. This vulnerability is caused by insufficient input validation, which allows data to be written to memory outside the bounds of the buffer. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in a denial-of-service attack.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Out-of-bounds Write
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega, and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND discusses canary-based detection in detail.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: yes, technical impact: partial).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Advisories
- moxa.com/en/support/product-support/security-advisory/mpsa-240162-cve-2024-7695-out-of-bounds-write-vulnerabi…
- moxa.com/en/support/product-support/security-advisory/mpsa-240163-cve-2024-7695-out-of-bounds-write-vulnerabi…
- moxa.com/en/support/product-support/security-advisory/mpsa-240164-cve-2024-7695-out-of-bounds-write-vulnerabi…
Other vulnerabilities in PT-7728 Series
- 9.2 Critical severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 9.4 Critical severity
Recent Out-of-bounds Write vulnerabilities
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.1 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.1 Critical severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.