CyberSecBulletin
CVE-2025-14232NVD status: Analyzed

Satera LBP670C Series: Out-of-bounds Write

CVE-2025-14232 is a critical-severity out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Satera LBP670C Series from Canon, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected Satera LBP670C Series versions: 06.02 and earlier. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.9% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 60% of scored CVEs.

Patch this week

Critical severity: a successful attack would have severe impact.

What to do

  1. Check which version of Satera LBP670C Series you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
  2. Read the advisory on canon.jp for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
  3. Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.

Affected products and versions

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed in
CanonSatera LBP670C Series06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonSatera MF750C Series06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonColor imageCLASS LBP630C06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonColor imageCLASS MF650C Series06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonimageCLASS LBP230 Series06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonimageCLASS X LBP1238 II06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonimageCLASS MF450 Series06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonimageCLASS X MF1238 II06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonimageCLASS X MF1643i II06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonimageCLASS X MF1643iF II06.02 and earlierNot stated
Canoni-SENSYS LBP630C Series06.02 and earlierNot stated
Canoni-SENSYS MF650C Series06.02 and earlierNot stated
Canoni-SENSYS LBP230 Series06.02 and earlierNot stated
Canon1238P II06.02 and earlierNot stated
Canon1238Pr II06.02 and earlierNot stated
Canoni-SENSYS MF450 Series06.02 and earlierNot stated
Canoni-SENSYS MF550 Series06.02 and earlierNot stated
Canon1238i II06.02 and earlierNot stated
Canon1238iF II06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonimageRUNNER 1643i II06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonimageRUNNER 1643iF II06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonMf455dw Firmware06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonMf453dw Firmware06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonMf452dw Firmware06.02 and earlierNot stated
CanonMf451dw Firmware06.02 and earlierNot stated

Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 12 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.

How the severity score breaks down

Attack vector
NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
Attack complexity
LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
Privileges required
NoneNo account or login is needed.
User interaction
NoneNo action by a victim is required.
Scope
UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
Confidentiality
HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
Integrity
HighData or code can be modified at will.
Availability
HighThe component can be taken down completely.

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by CNA.

Scoring systemScoreSeverityScored by
CVSS 4.09.3CriticalCNA
CVSS 3.19.8CriticalCNA

Official description

Buffer overflow in XML processing of XPS file in Small Office Multifunction Printers and Laser Printers(*) which may allow an attacker on the network segment to trigger the affected product being unresponsive or to execute arbitrary code. *: Satera LBP670C Series/Satera MF750C Series firmware v06.02 and earlier sold in Japan.Color imageCLASS LBP630C/Color imageCLASS MF650C Series/imageCLASS LBP230 Series/imageCLASS X LBP1238 II/imageCLASS MF450 Series/imageCLASS X MF1238 II/imageCLASS X MF1643i II/imageCLASS X MF1643iF II firmware v06.02 and earlier sold in US.i-SENSYS LBP630C Series/i-SENSYS MF650C Series/i-SENSYS LBP230 Series/1238P II/1238Pr II/i-SENSYS MF450 Series/i-SENSYS MF550 Series/1238i II/1238iF II/imageRUNNER 1643i II/imageRUNNER 1643iF II firmware v06.02 and earlier sold in Europe.

Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.

The underlying weakness: Out-of-bounds Write

The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How developers prevent this class of flaw

  • Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
  • Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega, and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
  • Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND discusses canary-based detection in detail.

More Out-of-bounds Write vulnerabilities (CWE-787)

Timeline

  1. CVE record published.
  2. CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: yes, technical impact: total).
  3. Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).

References

Other vulnerabilities in Satera LBP670C Series

All Satera LBP670C Series vulnerabilities

Recent Out-of-bounds Write vulnerabilities

Spotted an error? Tell us.