Satera LBP670C Series: Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference
CVE-2025-14233 is a critical-severity release of invalid pointer or reference vulnerability in Satera LBP670C Series from Canon, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, without any action from a user. Affected Satera LBP670C Series versions: 06.02 and earlier. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.83% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 58% of scored CVEs.
Critical severity: a successful attack would have severe impact.
What to do
- Check which version of Satera LBP670C Series you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
- Read the advisory on canon.jp for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canon | Satera LBP670C Series | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | Satera MF750C Series | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | Color imageCLASS LBP630C | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | Color imageCLASS MF650C Series | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | imageCLASS LBP230 Series | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | imageCLASS X LBP1238 II | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | imageCLASS MF450 Series | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | imageCLASS X MF1238 II | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | imageCLASS X MF1643i II | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | imageCLASS X MF1643iF II | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | i-SENSYS LBP630C Series | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | i-SENSYS MF650C Series | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | i-SENSYS LBP230 Series | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | 1238P II | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | 1238Pr II | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | i-SENSYS MF450 Series | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | i-SENSYS MF550 Series | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | 1238i II | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | 1238iF II | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | imageRUNNER 1643i II | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | imageRUNNER 1643iF II | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | Lbp1238 Ii Firmware | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | Lbp632cdw Firmware | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | Lbp633cdw Firmware | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
| Canon | Lbp236dw Firmware | 06.02 and earlier | Not stated |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE; 12 further products are omitted here. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by CNA.
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 4.0 | 9.3 | Critical | CNA |
| CVSS 3.1 | 9.8 | Critical | CNA |
Official description
Invalid free in CPCA file deletion processing on Small Office Multifunction Printers and Laser Printers(*) which may allow an attacker on the network segment to trigger the affected product being unresponsive or to execute arbitrary code. *: Satera LBP670C Series/Satera MF750C Series firmware v06.02 and earlier sold in Japan.Color imageCLASS LBP630C/Color imageCLASS MF650C Series/imageCLASS LBP230 Series/imageCLASS X LBP1238 II/imageCLASS MF450 Series/imageCLASS X MF1238 II/imageCLASS X MF1643i II/imageCLASS X MF1643iF II firmware v06.02 and earlier sold in US.i-SENSYS LBP630C Series/i-SENSYS MF650C Series/i-SENSYS LBP230 Series/1238P II/1238Pr II/i-SENSYS MF450 Series/i-SENSYS MF550 Series/1238i II/1238iF II/imageRUNNER 1643i II/imageRUNNER 1643iF II firmware v06.02 and earlier sold in Europe.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference
The product attempts to return a memory resource to the system, but it calls the wrong release function or calls the appropriate release function incorrectly.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Only call matching memory management functions. Do not mix and match routines. For example, when you allocate a buffer with malloc(), dispose of the original pointer with free().
- When programming in C++, consider using smart pointers provided by the boost library to help correctly and consistently manage memory.
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, glibc in Linux provides protection against free of invalid pointers.
More Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference vulnerabilities (CWE-763)
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: yes, technical impact: total).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Advisories
Other vulnerabilities in Satera LBP670C Series
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
Recent Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference vulnerabilities
- 8.7 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 7.1 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.