Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial: Incorrect Authorization
CVE-2025-5822 is a high-severity incorrect authorization vulnerability in Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial from Autel, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an attacker with a low-privileged account, without any action from a user. Affected Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial versions: 1.36.00. The record does not name a fixed version, so check the vendor advisory. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.41% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is low compared with other CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Update Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50 Firmware to 1.39.51 or 1.56.51, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
- Update Maxicharger Ac Pro Firmware to 1.39.51 or 1.56.51, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
- Update Maxicharger Ac Ultra Firmware to 1.39.51 or 1.56.51, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autel | Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial | 1.36.00 | Not stated |
| Autel | Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50 Firmware | before 1.39.51; before 1.56.51 | 1.39.51, 1.56.51 |
| Autel | Maxicharger Ac Pro Firmware | before 1.39.51; before 1.56.51 | 1.39.51, 1.56.51 |
| Autel | Maxicharger Ac Ultra Firmware | before 1.39.51; before 1.56.51 | 1.39.51, 1.56.51 |
| Autel | Maxicharger Dc Compact Mobile Firmware | before 1.39.51; before 1.56.51 | 1.39.51, 1.56.51 |
| Autel | Maxicharger Dc Compact Pedestal Firmware | before 1.39.51; before 1.56.51 | 1.39.51, 1.56.51 |
| Autel | Maxicharger Dc Fast Firmware | before 1.39.51; before 1.56.51 | 1.39.51, 1.56.51 |
| Autel | Maxicharger Dc Hipower Firmware | before 1.39.51; before 1.56.51 | 1.39.51, 1.56.51 |
| Autel | Maxicharger Dh480 Firmware | before 1.39.51; before 1.56.51 | 1.39.51, 1.56.51 |
| Autel | Maxicharger Single Charger Firmware | before 1.39.51; before 1.56.51 | 1.39.51, 1.56.51 |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- LowA basic user account is enough.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by NVD.
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 8.8 | High | NVD |
| CVSS 3.0 | 7.1 | High | CNA (trendmicro.com) |
Official description
Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial Technician API Incorrect Authorization Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial charging stations. An attacker must first obtain a low-privileged authorization token in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the Autel Technician API. The issue results from incorrect authorization. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges to resources normally protected from the user. Was ZDI-CAN-26325.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Incorrect Authorization
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
- Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.
- Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: partial).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Third-party and government advisories
- zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-25-340/Third Party Advisory
Other vulnerabilities in Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial
- 7.5 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
Recent Incorrect Authorization vulnerabilities
- 8.1 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 8.8 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.