PostgreSQL: Heap-based Buffer Overflow
CVE-2026-2005 is a high-severity heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in PostgreSQL, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.8 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an attacker with a low-privileged account, without any action from a user. The record lists versions 18.2, 17.8, 16.12 as the first without the flaw, so updating PostgreSQL to one of those releases or later removes the exposure. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 1.35% chance of exploitation within 30 days, higher than 72% of scored CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Update PostgreSQL to 18.2 or 17.8 or 16.12 or 15.16, whichever matches your release line, or a later version.
- Read the advisory on postgresql.org for workarounds and exact fixed builds.
Affected products and versions
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- LowA basic user account is enough.
- User interaction
- NoneNo action by a victim is required.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- HighAll data handled by the component can be read.
- Integrity
- HighData or code can be modified at will.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H. Scored by CNA.
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 8.8 | High | CNA |
| CVSS 3.1 | 8.8 | High | CNA |
Official description
Heap buffer overflow in PostgreSQL pgcrypto allows a ciphertext provider to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.2, 17.8, 16.12, 15.16, and 14.21 are affected.
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Heap-based Buffer Overflow
The product writes past the end of a buffer that was allocated on the heap.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Pre-design: Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
- Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
- Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND discusses canary-based detection in detail.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: total).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Other references
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19009
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:19010
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3730
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3887
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:3896
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:4024
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:4059
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:4063
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:4064
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:4074
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:4075
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:4110
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:4254
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:4441
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:4475
Other vulnerabilities in PostgreSQL
- 7.2 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 7.2 High severity
- 8.8 High severity
Recent Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerabilities
- 9.8 Critical severity
- 8.2 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 8.1 High severity
- 7.3 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.