Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.3 for RHEL 9: Out-of-bounds Read
CVE-2026-56210 is a high-severity out-of-bounds read vulnerability in Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.3 for RHEL 9 from Red Hat, with a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.1 out of 10. It can be exploited remotely over the network by an unauthenticated attacker, but only if a user takes part, for example by opening a link or file. There is no confirmed exploitation so far. EPSS estimates a 0.58% chance of exploitation within 30 days, which is low compared with other CVEs.
High severity with no evidence of exploitation so far.
What to do
- Check which version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.3 for RHEL 9 you run against the affected versions below, and install the vendor's latest release.
- Until you can update, restrict network access to the affected service so it is not reachable from untrusted networks.
- Because the attack needs a user to take part, warn users about unexpected links and files related to this product until it is patched.
Affected products and versions
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.3 for RHEL 9 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.4 for RHEL 9 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.5 for RHEL 9 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.3 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.3 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Hardened Images | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.4 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.5 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat AI Inference Server | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) | Not specified in the record | Not stated |
Version data comes from the organisation that assigned the CVE. Confirm against the vendor advisory before deciding you are unaffected.
How the severity score breaks down
- Attack vector
- NetworkCan be exploited remotely over a network, including the internet.
- Attack complexity
- LowNo special conditions are needed; the attack works reliably.
- Privileges required
- NoneNo account or login is needed.
- User interaction
- RequiredA user must take an action such as opening a file or link.
- Scope
- UnchangedImpact stays within the vulnerable component.
- Confidentiality
- LowSome restricted data can be read.
- Integrity
- NoneNothing can be modified.
- Availability
- HighThe component can be taken down completely.
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H. Scored by CNA (redhat.com).
| Scoring system | Score | Severity | Scored by |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVSS 3.1 | 7.1 | High | CNA (redhat.com) |
| CVSS 3.1 | 7.1 | High | CNA |
Official description
A heap-buffer-overflow read vulnerability was found in libaom, the reference AV1 codec implementation. A missing bounds check in the SVC (Scalable Video Coding) layer ID control function allows setting a spatial_layer_id exceeding the configured number of layers. This causes an out-of-bounds heap read of approximately 40,728 bytes when computing a layer context array index. An attacker who can influence SVC encoder parameters in a network-facing service could exploit this for information disclosure (heap content leak) or denial of service (segmentation fault from hitting unmapped memory).
Source: the CVE record as published by its numbering authority, via NVD and CVE.org.
The underlying weakness: Out-of-bounds Read
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
How developers prevent this class of flaw
- Use a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.
Timeline
- CVE record published.
- CISA published its SSVC assessment (exploitation: none, automatable: no, technical impact: partial).
- Record last changed materially (score, affected products, status or references).
References
Other references
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:30814
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42875
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:51100
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:51146
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:60520
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:61627
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:61628
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:61629
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:68634
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:68637
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:68638
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:68639
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:68640
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:68696
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:68697
Other vulnerabilities in Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.3 for RHEL 9
- 8.6 High severity
- 7.1 High severity
- 7.1 High severity
- 7.6 High severity
Recent Out-of-bounds Read vulnerabilities
- 7.8 High severity
- 7.5 High severity
- 9.1 Critical severity
- 9.1 Critical severity
- 8.2 High severity
- 7.8 High severity
Spotted an error? Tell us.