CyberSecBulletin

Philips vulnerabilities

We track 16 vulnerabilities in Philips products across 6 products. 16 are rated high or critical, and 2 have been exploited in real attacks. The most recent was published on November 12, 2026.

16vulnerabilities
1critical
15high
2exploited
8.3average CVSS score

Latest Philips vulnerabilities

  • 8.8 High severity

    Hue Bridge Pro: Protection Mechanism Failure

    CVE-2026-122044Philips

    Philips Hue Bridge Pro Protection Mechanism Failure Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge Pro. Authentication is not required to exploi

  • 8.0 High severity

    Hue Bridge Pro: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command

    CVE-2026-118632Philips

    Philips Hue Bridge Pro SQL Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge Pro. Although authentication is required to exploit this vu

  • 8.8 High severity

    Hue Bridge: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

    CVE-2026-3562Philips

    Philips Hue Bridge hk_hap Ed25519 Signature Verification Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge. Authentication is not required to expl

  • 8.0 High severity

    Hue Bridge: Heap-based Buffer Overflow

    CVE-2026-3561Philips

    Philips Hue Bridge hk_hap characteristics Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge. Although authentication is

  • 8.8 High severity

    Hue Bridge: Heap-based Buffer Overflow

    CVE-2026-3560Philips

    Philips Hue Bridge HomeKit hk_hap_pair_storage_put Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge. Authentication is

  • 8.1 High severity

    Hue Bridge: Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption

    CVE-2026-3559Philips

    Philips Hue Bridge HomeKit Accessory Protocol Static Nonce Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge. Authentication is not required to exp

  • 8.1 High severity

    Hue Bridge: Missing Authentication for Critical Functionality

    CVE-2026-3558Philips

    Philips Hue Bridge HomeKit Accessory Protocol Transient Pairing Mode Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge. Authentication is not requi

  • 8.0 High severity

    Hue Bridge: Heap-based Buffer Overflow

    CVE-2026-3557Philips

    Philips Hue Bridge hap_pair_verify_handler Sub-TLV Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge. Although

  • 8.8 High severity

    Hue Bridge: Heap-based Buffer Overflow

    CVE-2026-3556Philips

    Philips Hue Bridge HomeKit Pair-Setup Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge. Authentication is not required

  • 8.0 High severity

    Hue Bridge: Heap-based Buffer Overflow

    CVE-2026-3555Philips

    Philips Hue Bridge Zigbee Stack Custom Command Handler Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge. User interact

  • 7.2 High severity

    IntelliSpace Portal: Use of Hard-coded Credentials

    CVE-2025-3426Philips

    We observed that Intellispace Portal binaries doesn’t have any protection mechanisms to prevent reverse engineering. Specifically, the app’s code is not obfuscated, and no measures are in place to protect against decompilation, disassembly, or debugging. As a

  • 7.3 High severity

    IntelliSpace Portal: Deserialization of Untrusted Data

    CVE-2025-3425Philips

    The IntelliSpace portal application utilizes .NET Remoting for its functionality. The vulnerability arises from the exploitation of port 755 through the deserialization vulnerability. After analyzing the configuration files, we observed that the server had set

  • 7.7 High severity

    IntelliSpace Portal: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory

    CVE-2025-3424Philips

    The IntelliSpace portal application utilizes .NET Remoting for its functionality. The vulnerability arises from the exploitation of port 755 through the "Object Marshalling" technique, which allows an attacker to read internal files without any authentication.

  • 9.8 Critical severity

    Vue PACS: Use of Default Credentials

    CVE-2023-40704Philips

    The product does not require unique and complex passwords to be created during installation. Using Philips's default password could jeopardize the PACS system if the password was hacked or leaked. An attacker could gain access to the database impacting system

  • 7.8 High severity

    Microsoft Office and WordPad Remote Code Execution Exploited

    CVE-2017-0199MicrosoftEPSS 99.5%

    Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, Microsoft Office 2010 SP2, Microsoft Office 2013 SP1, Microsoft Office 2016, Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted document, ak

  • 8.8 High severity

    Microsoft Windows Server Message Block (SMBv1) Remote Code Execution Exploited

    CVE-2017-0143MicrosoftEPSS 93.3%

    The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute ar